If you're talking about the one that takes place in the sheriff's office? That was with reporter Hillary Lake with WCPO, not Jody Barr.
Well CoolCats, bbm I'm glad you asked what I THINK. It makes me feel the defense attorney has no "angst" in working with AC. Always sits closest to AC (from the prosecution side.) Perhaps he has already decided she is "one sharp cookie" and has every detail backed up and ready to challenge, so no reason to be argumentative or acrimonious towards her. Heck, if I was GW4, I would be pleased he is comfortable speaking with the Special Prosecutor....How could it hurt him? I thought it was great he scanned the gallery, because those are the same relatives and friends of the victims the jurors will see. If it made a "Wow" impression on him, it may do the same for jurors. IMO. I can't help but wonder if his attorneys will cooperate in requests by the attorney's for co-defendants to speak with GW4? I feel there is a great possibility GW4 may have already been culled from the herd, so to speak.
Not me. If my life was literally on the line, I would rather have an attorney like FW to fight them tooth & nail. Regardless of how much evidence they have their hands are gonna be full w/ that guy. I would rather my attorney be contentious, this is a fight for my life. It would feel better to me than them just going through the motions, I get sentenced to life/death, & they meet up that night for dinner. But, there is a huge difference in having a paid lawyer & a public pretender. Every defendant in this case is in over their head except FW. Reason being her attorney & lack of criminal record at her age. Her attorney is going to present her as a church going,God fearing pillar of the community that employs x amount of ppl. If she does get convicted,which I believe she will, I cant see her doing more than a couple years max or possibly probation. Her attorneys defense I believe that she didnt properly understand the context of the question that she lied about to the GJ, or some semantic of that. RN is gonna stroll into court w/ her public pretender & Canepa is gonna bury her. JMO
Ooops, CA misread your post...Yes, it is difficult to read gory details, and I may have to pass on many of those, myself. Apparently the W4's don't want the gory details to be released in photos. Not because W4'S are squeamish, but because they don't want the gravity of their crimes to show they were committed by brutal, mindless monsters. Besides the sheer number of victims, their young ages, and the viciousness of the crime....how can one not care? How can one not wonder what kind of warped minds make a plan to spare the dogs, but kill human beings? I've never heard that in a church sermon.Well this taxpayer disagrees. IMO the only ones who deserve to know the details of that night are the families of the victims. We as a society are naturally curious as to the whens, the whys, and the hows, but are not guaranteed anything.
Why should every gory detail of 8 murdered people be of interest to any outsiders? It baffles me.
Reader doesn't get along with Jody Bar very well. This is because J.B. investigates justice/LE mistakes and made a story on the evidence warehouse.
They interviewed Jake same day
True
Our conversations are not always about the R murders. We also talk about life experiences ect. I think of this forum as a group of friends with similar interests that get together to talk about what's new in the case but talk about other things too. I think that is why so many people read this thread and we all keep coming back every day. There are interesting people here who just happen to be interested in the R murders. So yes it has entertainment value just as a group of friends that you meet for lunch every day has entertainment value. The facts that are posted here about the R murders are an added bonus.
I did not meant that Reader made a mistake. That's your interpretation.
