kittythehare
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
- Messages
- 17,660
- Reaction score
- 101,104
Ref to the above report again, any excuse to stay out of reddit's pigs and what they do to people...No, that is not what the article you referenced stated Bavaria. Nor is it suggested anywhere in the document here http://dig.abclocal.go.com/wls/documents/2019/020719-wls-iteam-christensen-blood-handprint.pdf
where the FBI were asked to justify their already well proven evidentiary tests.. From Pg 27 of above document
Here, the blood was not identified as a small stain on the bottom of a shoe; it was identified in significantly larger areas, including handprints, in the defendant’s apartment. Some of the samples have been positively identified as blood (through confirmatory testing) with the victim’s DNA located in those same samples. Moreover, unlike in Moody, the other evidence in the case, including the defendant’s own statements, establish the presence of the victim’s blood, making the presumptive test results tending to establish the location of the blood highly relevant.
There was never, in any report I read ever , a suggestion that nothing remained of her, it's just that she was never found.
And at this stage we have no idea how he dealt with her body post mortem or how he disposed of it.
We have a science graduate grasping at straws and citing inappropriate and inadequate testing in a desperate attempt to destroy what little evidence the fBI analysed and proved already.
YY is still a missing person.
I'm not finding proof absolute of death from that laboratory result, proof of presence in his apartment and proof her blood is there is what exists.
Whereas it is possible he dismembered her body post mortem, it is unlikely and improbable that he did it in order to flush it down a toilet.
The defence must be costing the state a considerable amount of money.
All the media were ambivalent about whose handprint it was, actually.
Recall they requested and gained permission to record his handprint while he was in jail?
Report refers to a large handprint, by which, I took to mean fully formed as opposed to physically large
YY was small. I don't know whether they requested handprints from Michelle or TEB, they may well have, but suppose they did not?
do they have her blood on his handprint and is it sufficient proof for a dP case?
I have a feeling it is not.
He can still say, her dna got there because she was in the car,touching things in apartment that had been in car after her, a stretch, but this dude goes the full distance re stretching.
I'm seriously having a really hard time believing this is his first.
Was there sufficient blood to assume a knife crime had been the cause of death or was it merely expectorated or vomited blood? Strangulation is his thing very much too.
He did a really thorough job of cleaning up which is probably why the fBI are saying it was meticulously planned.
I'm just hoping they have an awful lot more than they're saying.
And i'm still hoping we'll (we the world who cares) find her for her family. And as Webthrush said pigs certainly don't eat jeans jackets bags and spectacles