Alyce
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2012
- Messages
- 12,992
- Reaction score
- 51,004
Exactly. When they charged him with raping her after her death there was at least some basis for the jury to conclude he was there during the murder. When that turned out to be not provable, and since the verdict they say the evidence that the sex was not consensual is that she was murdered - not because of medical evidence of injury after death - the case folds in on itself IMO. The burden of proof has to be higher than jumping to conclusions.
BIB that stands out for me - it is not a rational conclusion at all.