bos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2011
- Messages
- 588
- Reaction score
- 2,961
Possible reasons for appeal for CCTV 4:
1)witnesses - what did they see/hear? Any sounds within the park?Any vehicles parked at the entrance of the park?
2)if PR claims he left Libby alive in the park, exclude that anyone else put her in the water by finding out where these people were going, where had they been, can anyone else verify? Is there cause to conduct more intrusive investigation such as analysis of clothes to see if any forensic links to Libby?
3)do any of them know PR? Had PR contacted any of them?If so, what did he contact them for/we’re they in the area because he asked them to bring him something?(e.g a spare key for his car if he’d dropped his)
That’s just the questions that quickly came to mind, there’s probably more. I think they are important because these are gaps in LE’s knowledge that can perhaps refute or add weight to PR’s version of events. I don’t think any of the figures are PR
1)witnesses - what did they see/hear? Any sounds within the park?Any vehicles parked at the entrance of the park?
2)if PR claims he left Libby alive in the park, exclude that anyone else put her in the water by finding out where these people were going, where had they been, can anyone else verify? Is there cause to conduct more intrusive investigation such as analysis of clothes to see if any forensic links to Libby?
3)do any of them know PR? Had PR contacted any of them?If so, what did he contact them for/we’re they in the area because he asked them to bring him something?(e.g a spare key for his car if he’d dropped his)
That’s just the questions that quickly came to mind, there’s probably more. I think they are important because these are gaps in LE’s knowledge that can perhaps refute or add weight to PR’s version of events. I don’t think any of the figures are PR