D
Deleted member 278
Guest
Speculating is fine but, geez people, use your noodles!
Yes! I also have that conversation in my head. I would have to include, "Don't look at my search history on the computer. It means nothing!"Me too! Then I worry that if I ever do witness something and I’m able to give LE clear info, they’ll be suspicious that I know too much. “Well you see Officer, I’m a part of this website...”
I think a gun was used to control the girls, too. I'm not so sure that it was actually fired. I live out in the country and hear so many gunshots on a regular basis that they no longer register to me. I probably wouldn't be able to remember which day I heard one, much less what time.
I feel like with the time frame it doesn’t give BG much time to run around chasing both girls & trying to corral them. MooWhat if the victims were running as fast as they were able, through the uneven terrain dotted with clumps of bushes, trees, littered with fallen leaves and rotting fallen timber?
Is there a thread about Nicola Bowen who was tortured in a shack near Lafayetteville and where arrests include a connection to Delphi?
5th suspect arrested, charged in West Lafayette woman’s torture, homicide near Kentland
I couldn’t even imagine the confusion and mistrust this would cause if this was the case. Leo’s and their entities are so passionate about this case, I couldn’t see them deceiving the families and public like this.
I'm stuck on what a WSer posted awhile ago. A witness on the trail that day said she heard a couple arguing. Could that have been Abbey and/or Libby with BG - and they weren't arguing as much as perhaps pleading while he was ordering?
Shudder to think of it.
jmo
That is a good question. We know the first sketch came from the FBI. They use a program called FACES, an added feature is extracting facial features from video to create a composite. So was the FBI fooled by the disguise or did they just rely on the software? If the witness who was afraid saw him with his head and face covered they just saw his eyes, so the rest of the sketch had to be guessed at, IMO. But then according to some retired LE officers who claimed to have inside info, the sketch was a SO who was arrested and convicted last year.and was the original sketch of someone that was not placed at the park by a witness but simply came off the assumption that BG looked like a known SO? Did the FBI not analyze the video to see what we now see - a younger, thinner person without facial hair?
BP said there is audio of the girls interacting with him.I'm stuck on what a WSer posted awhile ago. A witness on the trail that day said she heard a couple arguing. Could that have been Abbey and/or Libby with BG - and they weren't arguing as much as perhaps pleading while he was ordering?
Shudder to think of it.
jmo
I feel like with the time frame it doesn’t give BG much time to run around chasing both girls & trying to corral them. Moo
So blood chilling.BP said there is audio of the girls interacting with him.
BP said there is audio of the girls interacting with him.
I started do that after watching the OJ trial when they were questioning the Gretna Green area residents on what they heard when. I thought I better pay attention just in case.I also look at the clock when I hear or notice something that "could" be something - because of WS! jmo
They have involved Nasa and Disney to to make the quality of the pictures they can .The FBI are involved.Does anyone know how large the Delphi PD is? I only ask because some of the smaller agencies don't know about DNA Parabon, or don't have the funds to get a profile and genealogy done. I know of a PD in outskirts of a large city, that is not familiar with the process and was asking about it recently. We just assume that everyone knows what we know. But the truth is, not every agency has the money or the manpower, or is up on all the new technology that is out there to help solve these cases. I really think that if they have a full profile this would be a great way to go.
He may not have needed to, but LE has stated that he probably looks different than he did 2 years ago, such as having longer hair or growing a beard.He did not need to make himself look different if he looked nothing like the first picture of BG.
That is a good question. We know the first sketch came from the FBI. They use a program called FACES, an added feature is extracting facial features from video to create a composite. So was the FBI fooled by the disguise or did they just rely on the software? If the witness who was afraid saw him with his head and face covered they just saw his eyes, so the rest of the sketch had to be guessed at, IMO. But then according to some retired LE officers who claimed to have inside info, the sketch was a SO who was arrested and convicted last year.
While we have confidence to see the FBI step in, they may have been the agency who caused the last 2 years to be offtrack especially considering the ISP officer made the sketch 3 days afterwards without his head and face covered!
There are silencers. JMO.
It really is quite remarkable how close to the actual person those pictures are. I just looked through some of the test ones done and quite a lot of them are almost dead ringers to the DNA provider!Does anyone know how large the Delphi PD is? I only ask because some of the smaller agencies don't know about DNA Parabon, or don't have the funds to get a profile and genealogy done. I know of a PD in outskirts of a large city, that is not familiar with the process and was asking about it recently. We just assume that everyone knows what we know. But the truth is, not every agency has the money or the manpower, or is up on all the new technology that is out there to help solve these cases. I really think that if they have a full profile this would be a great way to go.