What about St Johns? Not thinking it's related to murder of little girl in Orange Park?St.Johns river near me goes up north to Jacksonville.
What about St Johns? Not thinking it's related to murder of little girl in Orange Park?St.Johns river near me goes up north to Jacksonville.
From the Heavy.com article:
“I even walked all the way across the bridge and back. I only (saw) a guy when I first got there and another couple once I got on the bridge CE wrote. “I didn’t see the girls at all. I also didn’t take the trail that leads to the right. Only took the trail that lead to the bridge.”
This may have been mentioned before. The wording on this has always bothered me. CE was alone. She saw a guy when she first got there then saw another couple when she got on the bridge. This seems to me she is saying she saw a couple of guys. There isn’t “another” couple, man and woman, to refer back to. Is anyone else reading it this way?
Oh yes. Interviewed on camera too...which was his undoing, actually. Beast.
I've considered the two victim question, as well. I don't think it'd be difficult to control two young, scared girls with a weapon, nor would it require experience. IMOI also feel he went out that day to that area with possibly assault but definitely murder on his mind. Taking two victims though sounds awful brash for the first time. I tend to lean towards that he'd killed before. JMO
The scary thought to me is that maybe none of this was planned, at all. Maybe he wasn't even sure what he was going to do as they went "down the hill."After seeing the area where they were murdered, the suspect must have had an intimate geographical knowledge of the area, and, it seems like he planned it well - as if he knew they were going to be there, and he had planned their murder. I can't help but to think, 1. The suspect is someone who is happily acquainted with the family which is why the girls complied with him (I don't think they knew they were going to be hurt at all), and, 2. I think this guy has definitely killed before - maybe even a few times. I mean, he was able to exercise power over 2 young girls very quickly and presumably easily (the route from the bridge to the area where they were killed is a ways down the only part of that hill that's not really steep - then down various paths until you get to the farmer's property). Why net to the farmer's field???
Are subpoenas issued also for depositions?
Me, too. That first sip of the first coffee is imperative!ETA I just realized you're talking about subpoenas during the period Getting ready before trial. I now see you might be talking and just general terms. So below was written before I had my first sip of my first coffee! But I would I think if somebody is being deposed, that would result from a subpoena also as Depositions are a part of the discovery process in which litigants gather information in preparation for trial.
Absolutely, yes. The defense will subpoena the state Witnesses for appearance for all depositions. The notice of subpoena will be presented to the court.
The only reason I know this is because I am following another trial and keeping up with such subpoenas. And we are seeing a delay because some of the people were not found to depose in time for the original court date.
Good day everyone. I'm sitting here sipping my morning coffee pondering the timing of an arrest in this case. I sure do anticipate it coming soon. I like the quoted post alot because it gives me a chance to shine a spotlight on a key point.Oh yes. Interviewed on camera too...which was his undoing, actually. Beast.
I also feel he went out that day to that area with possibly assault but definitely murder on his mind. Taking two victims though sounds awful brash for the first time. I tend to lean towards that he'd killed before. JMO
Do you think he planned to attack someone at the park that day? I was just thinking about intent. He'd have had to intend to cause harm to someone most likely to be carrying a gun in the pocket of his jacket. Concealed carry is one thing, but carrying a handgun that way is not that. Just curious if you think he planned on attacking someone that day and if you think he's done this previously? TIA
Interestingly, early on LE never said DNA is key - they said technology is key. And Riley may have gotten it wrong but I’ve noticed a few times where reference to the cellphones is plural.
Feb 17, 2017
ISP on Delphi murders: "Everyone is a suspect"
Delphi, Indiana: State police is technology is key in the search for the Delphi killer
“We’re checking their cell phones, we’re checking their social media places Twitter, Facebook and that to see if there’s some type of connection there,” said Sgt. Riley. “We’re looking at every possible option.”....”
I agree. It’s frustrating that the search was called off, but logical based on the reasons you stated above. It’s frustrating that there were 2 sketches, but logical too. When this first happened I remember seeing the photo on the news and my first thought was that kinda looks like my neighbor - a 40ish chunky man. I’m 4 states and about 900 miles away so it couldn’t have been him. The first sketch LOOKED like the person depicted in the photo. My question earlier about the sketch wasn’t being critical, but more trying to rationalize the switch in investigative strategy.Not only was public safety a concern, but what would it have been like to have all those people walking around and potentially disturbing the crime scene? Even with hindsight 20/20, I'm glad they called it off. Searchers would've been almost right on top of the girls if they'd continued on and the defense would've had a field day with any evidence that was recovered.
If my kids disappeared from that particular park I would not automatically assume they were dead. If after walking around and calling out for them for several hours didn't work then I'd first assume that they were no longer at the park. I'd think maybe they caught a ride with a friend and the phone died, there was an accident and someone took them to a hospital and our wires were crossed, etc. My instinct would not be that they were both dead right there where we stood. The park isn't that big. With as many people as they had out that night, if the girls had been there but were hurt or hiding or whatever, they'd have heard the searchers. When they didn't emerge, I would have thought of other scenarios first. And that's kind of what happened here. Nobody expected to find them the way they did.
What's interesting, too, is that it's complete strangers who have no real ties to the case or to the girls who have been criticizing LE over this. The girls' families have not.
Excellent idea, but unfortunately wasn’t a feature at the time. SC also has a messaging component that kids use. The messages, like the pics, disappear unless the receiver/sender saves them. Could make this case very difficult if the girls knew bg somehow or someone close to him and that’s how they communicated.I imagine this has already been discussed, but there’s a feature on the Snapchat app where you can see all of your Snapchat friends’ current locations on a map. Each person shows up as a little cartoon icon that they pick for themselves. My daughter showed it to me once, and she had everyone in her grade as a “friend” even if though she’s not really friends with all of them, so about 60 kids. Most of them were clustered in our neighborhood, but I could quickly pick out who was traveling, who was outside of our town, etc. So.... speculating, maybe BG simply had access to a one of Libby’s classmates phone, and just glancing at it was able to see that there was a young girl at the trailhead, which is on the edge of town. Since Abby didn’t have a phone, he may have assumed that Libby was alone. MOO.
YesAre subpoenas issued also for depositions?
I imagine this has already been discussed, but there’s a feature on the Snapchat app where you can see all of your Snapchat friends’ current locations on a map. Each person shows up as a little cartoon icon that they pick for themselves. My daughter showed it to me once, and she had everyone in her grade as a “friend” even if though she’s not really friends with all of them, so about 60 kids. Most of them were clustered in our neighborhood, but I could quickly pick out who was traveling, who was outside of our town, etc. So.... speculating, maybe BG simply had access to a one of Libby’s classmates phone, and just glancing at it was able to see that there was a young girl at the trailhead, which is on the edge of town. Since Abby didn’t have a phone, he may have assumed that Libby was alone. MOO.
I also remember the word "targeted" used, but can't recall where.The Delphi trail seem a really unlikely place for anyone to preplan an attack in the middle of the day.
But bridge is reportedly is 853 ft long, almost 3 football fields, so crossing it right to the end placed the victims quite a long distance away from others on the trail, obviously giving the killer an advantage.
Ever since I first noticed that dirt road that runs beneath the far end of it my theory has been this was an attempted abduction, much like what happened to Jamie Closs except the girls tried to make a break by attempting to flee. But the car parked from noon to 5 pm at the other location has thrown a spanner into that possibility unless it was parked there as a decoy and two people were involved. But that theory becomes a little complicated.
Does anyone remember, around the second anniversary did LE use the word “targeted”? I seem to remember that being discussed but maybe it’s my imagination.