Jim_M
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2016
- Messages
- 2,239
- Reaction score
- 11,918
Because it was “quite heavy, and awkward to manipulate”??Confusing indeed. Why would Hoade conduct his examination on the “understanding “ that a blood-covered concrete block was not the murder weapon and didn’t merit collection and sampling as evidence of a crime?
Wouldn’t it be better to collect and sample it in order to include or exclude it as said weapon?
ETA: but it had blood on all six surfaces. And then there’s the hair. Whose hair, if it wasn’t examined?!