Just in.... appears loaded..
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilcd.70076/gov.uscourts.ilcd.70076.348.0.pdf
The Extent to Which the Government’s Cross-Examination Opens Doors Cannot Be Determined at this Time Next, in a brief paragraph, the government asserts that Dr. Sorensen may not testify concerning “prison facilities or their alleged abilities to manage and guard against inmate violence," id. at 4, citing United States v. Johnson, 223 F.3d 665, 672-75 (7th Cir. 2000). As the Motion notes, the defense has indicated that it does not plan to get into this area on direct examination. The Motion does assert, without specification, that “some of [the] slides” that have been provided the government “’may broach’ this topic.” Motion, at 4. To the extent that the government has legitimate concerns about particular slides inappropriately referencing the area of BOP’s abilities to monitor and control inmates, the slides can likely be appropriately revised if called to the defense’s attention. Although the government does not address the scope of its desired prohibition in the brief paragraph raising this issue, the suggestion in the heading of Point II on page 4 of the Motion goes too far. In that heading, the government suggests that Dr. Sorensen
somebody else needs to decipher this.. the bit about slides? What slides and slides of what? Damnit. I just got this sinkin' feeling that the slides will show the mind of somebody truly dangerous and insane.
This is looking like mental illness is back on the table... but I was up all night and stupid with tiredness?
Edit=
Jonathan Sorensen - Wikipedia
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bsl.2370130105
I'm assuming that the insanity bit for the penalty phase is back on the table because the evidence they possess is so graphic that it will lead to no other conclusion during the trial- only a madman could have done this.
Thus it rolls int0 penalty phase.
Therefore it's on and our boy has successfully avoided Govt shrink who would have blown his cover apart in 5 minutes flat.
Document is highly loaded with sarcasm. Judge cannot miss it.
Are they attempting to get themselves disbarred as someone else asked recently?
