SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,204
- Reaction score
- 175,100
Are the statements from the time of the disappearance or from the time of the inquest?
It may be that in the next sentence of his statement, the constable explained the box. I feel like we're being played with, not being given the whole statements, not being told whether the clues have been dismissed as irrelevant. After a day or two of teasing us with a patch of blood, MSM condescended to say that it was animal blood. Possibly if we had access to the statements we'd read that the fluff is the wrong colour red and the hair definitely isn't William's, that the underwear was covered in mould and had probably been in the open for months or years.
I think you could be right about the 'clues' being useful at the time, but they may have been later discounted after testing.
The coroner has let these statements be viewed ... the coroner may not let any statements be viewed that contain relevant information from the ongoing investigation.
Just keeping in mind that the police seem to feel that a vehicle was used to remove William, that William could not be tracked further than the boundary of FGM's property, that William could have been '30 kilometres away by the time FM called the police'.
Australian Crime News