'No action' over 'vulnerable' teen victim alertMs Wright said she decided to contact the multi-agency safeguarding hub because "I thought there were a lot of men with access to her without mum in the house".
Not getting a great opinion of any of the adults closely involved here, admittedly what we see is only highlights but still, so far it seems like not everything we hear adds up, and Lucy was the scapegoat for the troubles in the home. She may well have caused much of it, teenagers can be volatile (I was a total pain at that age!), but it's not sounding much like they looked into possible reasons for her behaviour, or seriously considered removing the lodger who was clearly a focus of the troubles.
(Edit: the above is NOT meant to be victim-unfriendly in case it comes across that way; I mean her behaviour might have caused the arguments we hear about, however it is very likely there was an underlying cause for her behaviour which is not her fault; most likely, the lodger...)
Well done to the teachers in both schools, they did the right thing, just a shame social services let them down. I know it's a fine line for them but this will clearly be another "if only" case where opportunities were obviously missed.
Different source, but this precedes the above comment:Bit more from one of the teachers which I don't think was reported.
Ms Wright said she decided to contact the multi-agency safeguarding hub because "I thought there were a lot of men with access to her without mum in the house".
'No action' over 'vulnerable' teen victim alert
Court told social services took no further action over concerns for murdered schoolgirl Lucy McHughEmma Wright, the safeguarding lead at St Anne's Catholic School in Southampton, told Winchester Crown Court that Lucy, a Year Seven pupil, had been taken out of class for using her mobile phone in June 2017.
Ms Wright said: "She told me she was using her phone to Snapchat someone called Stephen about school."
She said that she arranged for a meeting with Lucy's mother, Stacey White, who did not turn up.
Ms Wright said on another occasion in June, Lucy had her phone confiscated again.
She said that she had been told by another pupil that Lucy had been using it to message her boyfriend.
Ms Wright said that Lucy told her that in the evening she was at home with her mother's partner, Richard Elmes, Stephen Nicholson and his brother.
Lucy was totally failed by every adult in her life apart from her teachers of course. Vulnerable to say the least.
Is it even possible for Stacey to be tracking Lucy's messages if she was using SnapChat as the school said she was?A few more details from yesterday's evidence from Ms Wright ( St Annes school )
Ms Wright said she spoke to Ms White and said: “Mum didn’t seem surprised, mum told me she tracks all of Lucy’s messages and mum seemed unconcerned.”
She added: “Mum was quite confrontational, was very cross, she was very, very unhappy that we had contacted social services about Stephen.
“Mum had contacted school on a number of occasions about wanting Lucy to move school.”
Ms Wright also said that concerns were raised about Lucy coming to school without lunch, with her spending £5 on sweets instead.
Court told social services took no further action as schoolgirl concerns raised - Care Appointments
11:15am
Mr Newton-Price asks why Ms Crease did not tell the police about the letter being destroyed. She tells the court she "lied" to the police about the letter, which she said she "regrets". She describes it as "probably the worst thing she has done in her life". She tells the court she "panicked" and believed telling the police would have "taken police away from the right direction" in the case. She said she later told the police about the letter being burned.
LIVE: Lucy McHugh murder trial continues today
I think, if I'm following correctly, she's referring to the bank letter he burned on the night Lucy was missing. Caught on neighbour's CCTV.The letter she didn't read may have taken police in the wrong direction?