The authorities obviously would have all this information. Ff are CLEARED.
I am fully aware of the CLEARED aspect but inquest testimony as reported by media repesentatives raises a conflict for me. I am only discussing TIMELINE....with NO inferences against any foster family members (FFC MFC FGM) from my perspective.
It is a highly relevant discussion topic from my perspective to try and figure out who drove the 4wd drive out of Benaroon Drive at 10.30 and the timeline of that tragic morning.
My participation here is about dear sweet William ....does anything else really matter?
<modsnip: Discuss the case and not other members.>
It just so happened the media articles in Sept 2015 were published way after the information was initially released clearing the foster and bio families and that is a standing fact that cannot be denied from my personal observation.
It is a real conflict and compounding quandary to me to then learn from the FFC's own words as reported by media direct from 1st tranche of inquest and for the first time revealing that FFC had driven out Benaroon and along Batar Creek Rd at some stage on the day close to William's disappearance.
It could well be if the person was FFC driving this 4wd the vehicle may have been fitted with front and rear cctv cameras and FFC had operated such cameras and had driven out not ownly to physically search for William in the hope of physically rescuing him and calming his anguish but in a vain attempt to capture footage of any vehicles or persons she may have observed.
No mention of the time of this journey reported by the attending media reps.
If the time was mentioned during FFC testimony why would media withhold that information?
Another point I then consider is if FFC had her mobile phone with her during this journey and given the reported reception problems in that general area, would there still be cell tower pings and triangulations?
I have considered if she did drive the family's 4wd or FGM's vehicle and either was the latest model with whizbang technologies the electronic system of any onboard devices would record GPS locator tracking via satellite services which are not normally interrupted by reception problems experienced by mobile phone telco users.
I am told such technology is also capable of revealing epoch equation datum....basically beginning to end of a function or action or course of events and that these electronic readings can be discovered by forensic investigations.
Google earth uses such epoch based systems to calculate distance travel vs time. Electronic 'road mapping' devices installed in vehicles use epoch based systems.
The media reports and discussions by Fcarers in current podcasts give a very loose timeline. Paraphrased from my understanding...
Family arise on morning of 12th...police release detail in Sept 2015 and onwards, at approx 7am she observed 2 cars parked on street (now known to be adjacent to Sharpley residence and no 35)....family had breakfast etc ....MFC departed at approx 9am. FFC had said previously she observed the 2 vehicles at 9am (same location as above?). Did MFC also observe these vehicles; he had driven passed the parking location exiting 48 to commence his journey?
Note Sharpley testified she left her residence at 8.40am and did not observe 2 vehicles which were observed by FFC and police illustration shows vehicles to have been parked on road adjacent to the eastern boundary of her property driveway. Google earth view shows her view from her driveway on entering Benaroon would not be obstructed. FFC said previously she had observed the vehicles between 7 and 9.
FFC has said previously when she was playing with William and putting him into a climbing tree she had observed the vehicles still parked. (what time was this? Did she and the children go outside to farewell MFC and that was when she observed the vehicles at 9am the tine MFC departed ?)
Timeline .....MFC left 48 Benaroon at approx 9am and his presence in Lakewood area (verified by eyeball witnesses/receipts/cell tower pings/skype call (would pings verify exact on the ground foot print location or general area where pings triangulated?)(what would be area /distance boundary of ping triangulation?)(verification of exact feet on ground location Skype call made or that call was made within ping boundary area, of verified thaf skype was actually made?)...MFC travels to Kendall township stops and purchase a newspaper (witnesses/electronic of cash register transaction? Mobile tower pings...boundaries?). Sends text using electronic suri service (satellite or telco ?)....back in 5 minutes. It is said he arrived back at 10.30.
After MFC departs approx 9am.......(note this is time she said previously she had observed 2 cars).... FFC phones Spedding using FGM landline at 9.03am and leaves message (Craddock and FFC testimony verified)... then playing with William and female sibling with their bicycles on driveway (which driveway and time?)....then separately playing with female sibling with bicycle on driveway (which driveway, (time) (where was William at this time as he was not mentioned by media reports) and sibling and FFC observe teal vehicle (FFC testimony....not verifiable ....vehicle not located...driver not located....time?).....then FFC playing 'mummy/daddy tiger' games with William in garden and placing William in 'climbing tree' (where was sibling which tree? time?). FFC takes 5 photos using digital camera (FFC previously said 3) on back deck area between 9.15 (2014 media articles and posted on WS early threads) William goes off playing roaring tiger games again by himself....FFC goes inside to make tea with FGM and they sit on small rear deck area (time - where is sibling after photos taken?)....William is not heard and FFC commences searching inside house and garden area....MFC sends text using Suri onboard electronic system advising back in 5 minutes....he returns approx 10.30....FFC asks him if William is with him...no.....he races off searching .... at this point we are not told what FFC does and for how long.....then FFC is observed by Sharpley and is told William is missing.....she helps out and starts searching.....000 called at 10.56am....FFC indicated 'we' had searched for 15/20 minutes. Note 15 minutes would push back to say 10.40. 20 minutes would push back to about 10.35. MFC s saud ti have returned at 10.30. There is a 5 minute window. Could this be the time FFC drive down Batar Creek Rd?
Police responder arrived on scene 6 minutes after call....meets FFC in street (she had previously said she was standing at location where she had observed 2 vehicles parked ....1st responder enters 48 and comes across MFC exiting bathroom in distressed state...1st responder informs MFC he will search house....MFC exits and calls out 'William'.
In podcast the narrator includes detail from 1st responder statement. It was not detailed that FFC went inside 48 house with him. Was this because she had driven to Batar Creek Rd at this time?
No inferences just TIMELINE!
Note from time 1st responder arrived detail is included in podcast 4. Media links have been continually posted on WS threads.
Would anybody be willing to assist getting a 'no discussion' thread going where only (date ordered) links to articles from media, documentaries, interviews, podcasts etc from 12 September onwards permitted under WS ToS are archived?
Each link with a reference number and brief paraphrase summary with no personal comment.
I am certain a link archive would make life so much easier for all contributors and future contributors.
Prepared with our love and support for dear sweet adorable William
This wikipedia article has valid information and various article links.
