Turnuptime
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2019
- Messages
- 46
- Reaction score
- 335
The address in the personal protection records connects with a picture on JN's Facebook page.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So basically the press conference gave no new information. Why call one then?
To grandstand
To grandstand
To grandstand
Yes, the media had a lot of questions and the sheriff promised an update.I strongly disagree with this statement. The sheriff actually seemed worn out during the press conference. The public is asking for updates. The more the case is talked about in the media, the higher the possibility of a valid tip coming in. MOO.
Not that I know of but usually they call it a death investigation or a homicide investigation when there is a body or at least some kind of physical evidence that victims are deceased.Is anyone aware of any cases off of the top of their head where LE changed from a missing person to death investigation and the person turned up alive?
Bond hearing is Thursday. They searched his house last night.I'm worried that JN will be released because how long can he be held without bond for tampering with a vehicle? JMO
RSBM for focusI think it's possible that they just have not found the answers yet that they are looking for.
If they had physical evidence that indicates that the brothers are deceased, I would think they would have charged him with something else by now.
So maybe they are just going by the fact that the suspect drove the truck, he was the last to see them, and the brothers have disappeared. Imo
Very very interesting.RSBM for focus
At the press briefing on Friday, when asked what led them to change the search from a missing persons case to a death investigation, Sheriff said it was based on the fact that they hadn’t been able to find them, and what they had learned through the process of the investigation.
When asked the same question yesterday, his answer was “What's changed in that is ... the finding of the truck and working on different leads with investigators.”
I am of the opinion that they found some sort of evidence of foul play when the truck was discovered. IMO, they went into action almost immediately, even activating a major crime squad activated by 3 PM the same day.
Perhaps they found evidence of extensive blood loss inside (and possibly outside) of the vehicle. Maybe they sent samples in for DNA testing and got results back Thursday or Friday, confirming that the blood came from the brothers.
LE would still have to prove Garland was the perpetrator. Even if they find his DNA on the truck, he has already admitted to moving it, so that would explain it.
Maybe he told them something along the lines of: while waiting for Nick and Justin to arrive, he goes outside. He notices a truck sitting on the property, so he walks over to the vehicle to see what is going on. There is no one inside, but it is covered in blood. He finds the key on the ground nearby.
He is scared, thinking that no one will believe him because of his criminal history. He needs to get the vehicle off the property right now, so he drives it to the commuter lot, and leaves it there.
I know the story sounds very suspicious, but it might create reasonable doubt, IMO.
[More from the charging document in the previous case]
“21. It was further part of the scheme that on or about December 13, 2013, defendant Nelson obtained a farm personal property and liability insurance policy on his cattle through Farm Bureau Insurance in case of livestock drowning, shooting, or theft without disclosing that the FSA had first lien on all of his chattel.
22. It was further part of the scheme that from on or about December 15, 2013 through on or about March 30, 2014, defendant Nelson knowingly and intentionally made fraudulent statements to Farm Bureau Insurance, by falsely indicating his livestock had drowned or been stolen. Each time he made a claim, defendant Nelson signed a false sworn statement in a proof of loss. In fact, he had not lost the livestock in the manners claimed, and he was selling numerous cows and calves to various auction houses.
23. It was further part of the scheme that on or about March 29, 2014, in furtherance of his scheme, defendant Nelson took a vacation to the Kansas City, Missouri, area. He asked his farmhand to check and count the cattle behind his home, and the farmhand counted 34 cows
and 34 calves. Defendant Nelson indicated that was incorrect and it should be much higher. He came home, purportedly early, and took the farmhand to a wire fence that was cut and pulled it aside. The farmhand saw no evidence of cow movement in the area outside the fence, and he had never seen the number of cattle defendant Nelson claimed behind Nelson’s home. Defendant Nelson then falsely claimed to Farm Bureau Insurance that he had lost 40 cattle due to theft.
24. It was further part of the scheme that, without disclosing that the FSA had first lien on all of his chattel, defendant Nelson filed four loss claims to Farm Bureau Insurance, resulting in a loss of $31,320, and the proceeds were not remitted to the FSA as was required under the terms of the loans.
25. It was further part of the scheme that defendant Nelson ceased making repayments on his FSA loans as of January 12, 2015. His outstanding principal balance is $138,452.79, plus applicable interest and penalties. Defendant Nelson filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on June 25, 2015.”
View attachment 195759
So no, he didn’t just “break a rule on a loan.”
According to someone who claims to be a relative, and is posting freely on social media, JN is claiming it was not him but a friend. That cousin claims he does have a lawyer at least as of today.
Last night, I mentioned that I wondered what his explanation was for driving the truck and but not committing the murder. His story (as presented by a relative on social media), really fills in the blanks.
RSBM for focus
At the press briefing on Friday, when asked what led them to change the search from a missing persons case to a death investigation, Sheriff said it was based on the fact that they hadn’t been able to find them, and what they had learned through the process of the investigation.
When asked the same question yesterday, his answer was “What's changed in that is ... the finding of the truck and working on different leads with investigators.”
I am of the opinion that they found some sort of evidence of foul play when the truck was discovered. IMO, they went into action almost immediately, even activating a major crime squad activated by 3 PM the same day.
Perhaps they found evidence of extensive blood loss inside (and possibly outside) of the vehicle. Maybe they sent samples in for DNA testing and got results back Thursday or Friday, confirming that the blood came from the brothers.
LE would still have to prove Garland was the perpetrator. Even if they find his DNA on the truck, he has already admitted to moving it, so that would explain it.
Maybe he told them something along the lines of: while waiting for Nick and Justin to arrive, he goes outside. He notices a truck sitting on the property, so he walks over to the vehicle to see what is going on. There is no one inside, but it is covered in blood. He finds the key on the ground nearby.
He is scared, thinking that no one will believe him because of his criminal history. He needs to get the vehicle off the property right now, so he drives it to the commuter lot, and leaves it there.
I know the story sounds very suspicious, but it might create reasonable doubt, IMO.
According to someone who claims to be a relative, and is posting freely on social media, JN is claiming it was not him but a friend.