indicolite22
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
- Messages
- 9,735
- Reaction score
- 80,062
Interesting. IMO, he would not have killed them without a conflict (that's why I think this was about money). They were probably not the only people he defrauded. Was he going to kill them all? If the brothers suspected nothing, IMO he would be happy to have fooled someone once more. He likely wouldn't be thinking about the next visit at all.Escalation of Conflict? Or Escalation of Nelson's Fear??
@indicolite22 Thanks for your post. Good questions.
This post assumes (for sake of discussion) -
1. Nelson was committing fraud against Diemels (which to many of us, seems a certainty, but legally he's IUPGBARD);
2. Prior to July 21, Diemels had not made any unannounced visits to farm.
3. Diemels had not scheduled apptmt for July 21, perhaps not even announced by phone call from airport.
And post does not assume Diemels suspected Nelson of fraud, or if so, not assume they told Nelson of their suspicions.)
From moment they arrived, Nelson was doing mental gymnastics about how to prevent them from discovering his crimes. Even without direct accusations by Diemels, Nelson may have suspected they suspected fraud, and he knew another surprise inspection would unravel everything. He had to prevent that. Nelson's fear escalated, from zero mph pre-visit to Mach 1/speed of sound, when brothers were ready to leave, so he killed them, hid their remains.
Was there conflict?
Did Diemels explicitly voice to Nelson concerns of discrepancies or fraud? Based on employee's recounting of 11:00-ish phone convo w them, no indication of anything awry. If questioned, Nelson may have shown them cattle belonging to others (or otherwise placated them), and they may have been satisfied that everything was hunky-dory and ready to leave. So there may or may not have been conflict.
^All just possibilities.^ jmo