oceancalling
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2019
- Messages
- 643
- Reaction score
- 10,727
They have much more evidence than any of us know IMO, but the system is designed to ensure that every defendant receives a fair trial. Not to sound trite, but this isn't a TV show; it takes a LOT of time to build a case. There is a reason the charge of first degree murder does not have a statute of limitations and that reason is the seriousness of the offense. It is crucial to get it right. There is absolutely no reason for LE to rush its investigation, and every reason for it to take the time necessary to make sure all evidence, pointing to both guilt and innocence, is fully examined.Since there's very little developments in terms of the missing persons case or murder, folks seem to be focused more and more on custody and GF. Custody is really a totally different issue. None of us know what the kids think, or what their life is like with GF or without FD. Folks are ready to canonize JD and they make GF out to be a hero. That may all be true, but I, for one, don't know. It's really a distraction to create these personas for GF, JD, or FD. Sure, it seems FD did the deed, but he hasn't been charged yet. It does seem he genuinely loves the kids so I don't fault him for trying some legal maneuvering to get to see them. True, that if he did kill their mother (which it does seem to be the case), it's a strange way to show his love. It's why I'm so impatient with LE. If they have something yet are waiting for more, they are hurting the kids and GF. If they don't have anything more then they should go with what they've got and let the chips fall where they may. If this case is one that will go on for the next 4 years, then FD has every right to see his kids, and even raise them. It's getting to the point where I'm pretty disappointed in LE.
I take issue with two of your observations. though. First, I have seen no evidence that FD "genuinely" loves his kids. Men who genuinely love their kids do not move their mistress into the family home and then refuse to contribute a dime to their support for years. Men who "genuinely" love their kids at least act like they care when their childrens' mother goes missing. Men who "genuinely" love their kids do not pronounce their love for their mistress for millions to see during this traumatic time for their children.
Second, FD has invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination as it relates to JD's disappearance, as is his legal right in his criminal case. By doing so in the family case, however, he is now stuck with the "adverse inference", which is a very, very well-recognized legal doctrine, that he invoked because what he would have said would implicate him in JD's disappearance.
FD is no innocent victim, being unfairly denied access to his children by a biased legal system. He is a cold-blooded killer, who has taken advantage of every legal remedy available to him. In determining visitation, the question is no longer about what the parent demands. Even recognizing parental rights, the issue here is about what is in the best interests of these already traumatized children. IMO no judge is going to require visitation so long as criminal charges remain pending (and most likely, even long beyond that time).
Last edited: