I honestly am not a plant. You can follow other threads on other cases I've been interested in. And my questions are sincere. I don't deny that the trash run is suspicious. But, I also feel I understand a bit about the legal process. He's not charged with murder. He's not even charged in her disappearance. Yes he has been charged with tampering with evidence but it hasn't been brought to trial. I don't have the evidence and although the initial news reports seemed damning, there hasn't been anything since. He wants to see his kids. Look, I'm a dad that's been through a divorce. We had a reasonably amicable divorce so I have no bitterness, but I did feel very vulnerable through the process. Spouses can be vindictive. What if my spouse happened to go missing. Of course I'd be suspect #1, but what if LE had no evidence to that other than I cleaned up the floor. And, what if I really and truly had nothing to do with my wife's disappearance. Would it be fair to take the kids away from me? All I'm saying is I want more evidence. I want FD to be charged with her disappearance. Until they do, FD has every right to fight for his kids. Not only does he have the right, as a dad he has the responsibility.
FO did not even have the kids Before JD went missing.
Why should FO receive them now?
FO had only recently been allowed some Very Limited Supervised Visitation after a 10+ month window of NO visitation. ALL Based on FO's behavior and actions in the two years before JD went missing.
ALL of this was Long BEFORE JD went missing.
FO was Not even allowed to have Any alone time with the children or private conversations in English or Greek, Way Before JD went missing.
Just because JD is missing does not negate the fact that FD was Already considered UnSuitable to have Unsupervised visitation and Barely able to have Supervised visitation.
This had absolutely nothing to do with JD being missing.
Courts only Suspend or implement Supervised Visitations in very Serious cases. Judge Heller did NOT take this lightly and this was ALL Before JD went missing.
At this point, the Family Court Judge MUST err on the side of caution in protecting these children.
What if FO had the children? Would he do like the more recent cases of a parent killing the children and themselves? Or, would FO Abscond with the children to another country? Passports are not needed on a private jet.
Remember, I noted that Extradition Treaties are Only for people who are either accused of a crime or found guilty of a crime. So, once the children are in another country, they are gone for good.
IF FO had Any concern for the children, FO would not have killed their mother and/or made more than 30 stops along Albany Avenue in the Hartford Area, disposing of items containing JD's blood in the 'Trash Bin Odyssey of Stupidity Date Night' with MT.
FO and Ho are on State of the Art, Very Clear Videos, disposing of these items and FO has refused to answer questions in Family Court under his 5th Amendment right. Yes, FO has that right and guess what? The Family Court Judge has the Right to make Inference from FO's 'stand of silence' as to his possible Guilt.
Criminal Court is not even afforded this luxury. Family Court Definitely uses this asset available to them. In this case, the Inference is that FO is guilty of tampering with evidence at best and guilty of Pre Meditated Murder at worst.
Why put these children in that situation? Please do not say that FD's sister or niece could step in for the children. These people only saw the children once a year.
GF is more than capable, willing, and financially able to care for the children within these circumstances. GF provides security, stability, familiarity, and the massive amounts of love for these children that is very much needed in these circumstances.
Why not support the Judges decision to protect these children?
If your husband or ex was found disposing of your bloody items in the many bins along Albany Avenue, would You want Him to have custody of Your children?
Seriously?
MOO MOO MOO til the cows come home.
