gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,359
- Reaction score
- 229,686
Re: the "KK's the real killer" alternate theory.
That dog won't hunt, Massy. Or bark. Or sit. Or shake. Or even lie down.
It might play dead, but that's about it.
See, there are these pesky little things called "evidence" and "facts" that PF's "Defenders" are going to have to try to work around.
You've just enumerated a number of the facts that aren't lining up with a potential
"KK's the real murderer" narrative.
And that's only some of the evidence.
- KK's location at the time KB is last heard from, i.e., the 22nd, doesn't fit.
- KB's and PF's phones traveling together to the Franch on the 22nd doesn't fit.
- KB's and PF's phones traveling together for 2 days subsequent to the murder doesn't fit.
- PF lying about having contact w/ KB after the 22nd doesn't fit.
- PF's lying to both LE and KB's mom doesn't fit.
- The burn at the Franch doesn't fit.
- KK telling LE all the places they could find evidence that KB had been murdered doesn't fit.
Criminal cases aren't tried in the media.
The prosecution has not made public all of the evidence they have in this case.
The DA is not a halfwit.
Dan May was not duped into giving "the real killer" a sweetie beauty of a deal in exchange for testimony against an innocent patsy.
PF is many things, but an innocent patsy is not one of them.
In "The Defenders'" defense, they're attempting the impossible here.
Logically, there's no way to defend the indefensible.
PF has completely hamstrung the defense with his Wile E. Coyote-like maneuvers.
He didn't even need an ACME kit.
"KABOOM!"
"THUD!"
"Guilty, Your Honor."
"Th-th-th-that's all, folks!"
JMO.
Thank you. I really like your logical recitation of the facts.