dancinunderthemoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2014
- Messages
- 2,911
- Reaction score
- 3,112
The family can call in the GBI or FBI at any time and go over SS authority in this case but they have not, nor hired a PI we are aware of, nor gave to the reward fund
It would likely get solved once someone gets to work it, many cold cases do once someone else takes a look, something is usually missed
Like FF used to say, there are no perfect crimes, only imperfect investigations
It's sad one man is on this case, he wont even call in a cold case team apparently and that could be due to the fact there arent any high profile cases in the area and one of this magnitude and only one, would hate to have to turn it over but thats pride, which should have no role here
It would likely get solved once someone gets to work it, many cold cases do once someone else takes a look, something is usually missed
Like FF used to say, there are no perfect crimes, only imperfect investigations
It's sad one man is on this case, he wont even call in a cold case team apparently and that could be due to the fact there arent any high profile cases in the area and one of this magnitude and only one, would hate to have to turn it over but thats pride, which should have no role here
I think the point of the post is that police will follow the evidence, no matter what the story is 'said' to be (by those involved). So I wonder, if the Tex McIver case had been in SS's county... with SS believing Tex to be innocent.. then would it have still been prosecuted as a murder and would the prosecution have had the same amount of evidence to use in the trial, based on presumably what police had gathered? Or would it have been a bit short, because the sheriff believed McIver's version? Were other police involved in either of those cases, ie FBI, GBI, other?
While SS seems to have thought of many things in the Dermond case, and he keeps honking his own horn about how *he* thought about things that other investigators hadn't even thought of.. what if he, for whatever reason, may have a closed mind about a certain aspect of this Dermond case, and it's kind of preventing him from fully following through on checking it out fully, but there is no other LE doing this *with* him, so it's all about what SS is thinking?
ETA: My point in the above is.. if there is only one police body looking into/onto a given case, and the one person in charge, the one person who knows *everything* about the case, the one person who wants to be in on the investigation should he ever retire and it get transferred to someone else, how much pull does this one person have in the direction of the case, if there are no others to 'know everything' along with SS? And how much might that potentially have to do with whether a case gets prosecuted?
I find it deeply disturbing that it seems this case hinges on the brain-power of only one man, and that man declined assistance from the state, and the feds were only minimally involved in the beginning. Where is any oversight, or is none required in murder cases?