SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,197
- Reaction score
- 175,012
So far my assessment and direction of the case has been on what LE has said and what LE has not said.
I wonder if this will turn out like the Closs case where some of LE’s initial statements were not correct. In Jayme’s case, some things turned out to be different, for example “LE never saw a vehicle pass them”. (Paraphrasing, for those who followed the Closs case, Ykwim.)
Will there be a PC today? Big question for the moment is still “Is PS POI #2?” And if QJ is involved. Still sounds like it to me but we will see, moo. Is LE right about “others being involved”?
If PS is not POI #2 I can't imagine why police have not come out and said so. They wouldn't have to say who their suspect is, but they could say it is not PS. imo
Though they probably don't care what any of us think about a child *advertiser censored* carrying pervert.
But it sounds like they are having no luck in getting that first man to come forward.