We really don't know who might have signed or forged the signatures on those documents.I fully understand all the intricacies of handwriting characteristics and recognizing a forged signature. You understand them as well. That does not mean that AW understood it when the signatures were forged.
JMO, but I saw another family member's FB post telling what JW did to HR during that incident.
The judge ordered the audio to be given to defense on 10/22/19. And I don't think this was the first mention of it not being turned over. Still on 12/2, there was still no audio provided to the defense. This is just my opinion, but I don't think the state is just "forgetting" to turn this over. I don't think they are going to turn it over until they are actually forced to. Obviously, there is something they feel would be useful to some/all defendants.AC seemed to have no objection to giving Gerlach a copy of the audio file of RN's GJ.
I can only think of two possible reasons FG might be requesting it.
1) To make the the transcription document exactly matches the the wording of the audio file.
2) To see if the "Mystery Man in Blue" might have uttered anything (in the background of the audio) to potentially establish the MMB really exists and might be able to be identified.
JMO, MOO
I agree but respectfully disagree to a point. The document required a signature of the person giving the permission, 2 witnesses and RN’s signature (as notary)=4 signatures x4 documents. Assuming AW was one of the signators, that still leaves 3 other persons + HMR to replicate. It’s very difficult to replicate that many different signatory types and accurately match for 4 documents with only one person to have forged. In my line of work we compare signatures of Medicaid recipients on documents and find obvious flaws in the mannerisms of their signatures that are not carried through each document signature. For instance, one person may make rounded letters while another may make distinct straight line letters or add tails to certain letters. Usually the forger’s signature will contain some of these same elements. To replicate 3-4 people’s signature styles consistently on four different documents would be next to impossible. And if you had a signature from each and you traced it then that too is a red flag as no one’s signature looks EXACTLY the same on everything you sign. It’s the characteristics of the signatures that make them unique to that person.
Also, at least one of the documents (and perhaps all) had to have been submitted formally to the public as being a legal document (either to a court, a lawyer, an agency, etc)—it’s not considered a forgery if it has not been submitted as an authentic document. I do agree the forgery indictments could have been a blanketed charge as in “These are forged documents. Not sure who did it so all are charged until we figure out who did it.” My guess is it took more than 1-2 people to complete.
I'm out of the loop, exactly which recording was he asking for? The recording of AW and RN's forbidden phone conversations? If so, it's probably because the other attorneys and FW want to hear what was said.
In court at Fred's bond and arraignment hearing Canepa was very clear that Fred was present for the revenge and escape coversations.‘Do we know for sure she was present or just that the conversation took place at her house?
How do/can you do a notary for such a life altering "thing" as custody? Processed thru a family court would be needed wouldn't it?
I’ll bet he never gets that recording.He wants the GJ recording of RN’s testimony. He has the written version but it ONLY had her testimony that resulted in HER indictments, not the entire testimony.
So now the dam has burst. The W 4 are sitting in jails, have access to tv and internet, and have perhaps seen today's hearing. Who does anyone think Rita's change of plea will be affected by the most. Little George? Ang? I'm thinking George.
Remember what led to RN's hearing Dec 2? Bruce Dailey documents, JWs attorney in the custody battle. Sheriff Reader and Brian Reader being called as witnesses, along with Kayla Slusher. Let us not forget what brought us to yesterday and today. JMO
How do/can you do a notary for such a life altering "thing" as custody? Processed thru a family court would be needed wouldn't it?
Would W's be bondable? Hmmm..
Guardianship of a Minor in Ohio: How They Work, When They Apply, and What Happens When They're Contested
It is my understanding that these were not the usual custody documents but these were documents that desingnate a guardian in case the said parent became deceased.
what if both parents become deceased ? Now there is a custody controversy. Perhaps this was the controversy the documents were intended to solve. I think it would be risky and dangerous to go kill 8 people spread over 4 locations.
One day I'll figure out how to post LinkS. But be if i could i would post a blank of this document . It is i belive unknown who on the forged documents "HR" and "GW4" designated as a guardian. But i think it's pretty reasonable to guess it wasn't a Rhoden or GW4 ex wife or her family .
JMO
Loomis, please forgive me for being confused. I thought these witnesses were called by the Defense so I am not really sure how that would have forced the prosecution to agree to a plea deal? Thank you so much for helping me out.