Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In my uneducated opinion, they had more than enough to detain him for questioning after the wellness check on reasonable suspicion that he committed a crime just based on the fact her purse, phone, meds, etc, were still inside and basic common sense dictated that the only way his family could have left that house was in his truck.I think it all went down very fast, actually. They had him at the police station getting grilled but knew nothing until their prodding got him to start confessing. I think it was just a couple of days by the time that happened. Police can't act on suspicion so, no they couldn't move any faster. They have to have probable cause. They used the interrogations to get what they needed and once they got it, he never left jail after that. They did a good job.
SW posted the photo of the doll on facebook. That's where RW pulled it from.
That is correct but the photo originated with CW.SW posted the photo of the doll on facebook. That's where RW pulled it from.
I remember thinking, when his Dad said "so she killed Bella and CeCe" if he , the Dad really believed that. I think the Dad did not believe Shanann killed her daughters.
Yes, I do know that. Sorry, I wasn't clear about it.That is correct but the photo originated with CW.
I believe that since her FB was set to public, he'd be able to see it even if he had unfriended her.OK guys, admittedly I'm a little foggy on this one, but how could Ronnie have pulled the doll photo from SW's FB account (she posted it after CW sent it to her via phone in the first place on Thurs Aug 8, IIRC) if he had de-friended her while she was in NC? Unless there is proof I will keep assuming that CW gave it to Ronnie on the way to Frederick from the airport. Or that Ronnie saw it on CW's FB site when the photo was re-posted by SW (?)
LOL you are probably right. Unfriended in name only, he knew he could look at hers but made sure she couldn't look at his. But still he could have got it off of CW's site, no? CW's site would still have been showing SW posts at that point. Anyway SOMEHOW Ronnie had that post all ready to show law enforcement at the same moment he was stricken with grief over the deaths of his grand daughters.I believe that since her FB was set to public, he'd be able to see it even if he had unfriended her.
In my uneducated opinion, they had more than enough to detain him for questioning after the wellness check on reasonable suspicion that he committed a crime just based on the fact her purse, phone, meds, etc, were still inside and basic common sense dictated that the only way his family could have left that house was in his truck.
I also believe they should have considered the possibility of an accomplice from day one since there very well could have been a plan to have someone else dispose of her car.
During the prison interview, I recall him being prodded to admit how he didn't like Shanann forcing him to be in those FB videos and a number of questions about those caffeine-enhanced Thrive patches, but not a single question about what he might have planned to do with her car.
They did ask about why he looked up the "Battery" lyrics, and he told them NK had asked him about their meaning, but it wasn't right before arriving or right after leaving the oil site, even though he did indeed do so right after disposing of his family. Not a single followup question about that obvious lie.
When asked about his contact with NK after the murders, he told them that NK had texted him weird questions the day after asking him the name of her yoga studio and the name of her dog, and only after confirming he had access to the phone and not LE, did she instruct him to delete everything.
Yet somehow the detectives thought that NK might have believed Shanann had access to his phone, so she was asking him questions about his dog and his yoga studio, which made absolutely zero sense, especially since NK knew that Shanann and the girls were still missing.
Regarding the recovery of texts between NK & CW, I only recall seeing maybe a dozen in the discovery and those were provided to them by NK. The discovery specifically mentioned that none the texts from their work phones were recovered. There should have been hundreds if not thousands of texts between those two since they were texting each other constantly. What happened to those?
In my uneducated opinion, they had more than enough to detain him for questioning after the wellness check on reasonable suspicion that he committed a crime just based on the fact her purse, phone, meds, etc, were still inside and basic common sense dictated that the only way his family could have left that house was in his truck.
I also believe they should have considered the possibility of an accomplice from day one since there very well could have been a plan to have someone else dispose of her car.
During the prison interview, I recall him being prodded to admit how he didn't like Shanann forcing him to be in those FB videos and a number of questions about those caffeine-enhanced Thrive patches, but not a single question about what he might have planned to do with her car.
They did ask about why he looked up the "Battery" lyrics, and he told them NK had asked him about their meaning, but it wasn't right before arriving or right after leaving the oil site, even though he did indeed do so right after disposing of his family. Not a single followup question about that obvious lie.
When asked about his contact with NK after the murders, he told them that NK had texted him weird questions the day after asking him the name of her yoga studio and the name of her dog, and only after confirming he had access to the phone and not LE, did she instruct him to delete everything.
Yet somehow the detectives thought that NK might have believed Shanann had access to his phone, so she was asking him questions about his dog and his yoga studio, which made absolutely zero sense, especially since NK knew that Shanann and the girls were still missing.
Regarding the recovery of texts between NK & CW, I only recall seeing maybe a dozen in the discovery and those were provided to them by NK. The discovery specifically mentioned that none the texts from their work phones were recovered. There should have been hundreds if not thousands of texts between those two since they were texting each other constantly. What happened to those?
Given they had video showing CW walking back and forth loading his truck and that same video proved there was no other possible way they could have left that house, I believe that more than met the "reasonable suspicion" threshold required for police to detain him in Colorado, which could have preserved a probable crime scene.Hindsight is 20/20 and to imply that because Shanann's purse and car were home, the police should automatically have known everyone was dead and gone is a little much. Also, you can never detain someone for questioning, period. Even when someone is arrested and charged, they control whether they will be questioned or not. There was no way to save anyone's life here; they came and took a report, noticed some things were off, but in no way did they have enough to arrest and charge him that first night.
My main point in bringing up the yoga and dog questions was to point out just one of the obvious errors made by the detectives during the prison interview. That same error was even carried over to the redacted transcript.I didn't follow the case here. I followed through the press, TV, and Youtube so I may be sketchier on the details but here's my thoughts, based on what I recall:
I'm sure Chris was suspected from the beginning. You cannot detain or arrest someone on that, though. People have constitutional rights. Even the neighbor's video, and Chris' obvious sweating bullets, was not enough to arrest him, because it didn't show him carrying bodies or anyone but Chris. Investigators moved quickly to interrogate him and by Wednesday, he was no longer a free man. He basically confessed before a full scale search even commenced - and it would have commenced and they would have found Shannon's body at the site. But, it never got that far (a search) because they broke him and they did it fast. I thought it was some pretty stellar handling of their suspect.
As for NK... I know how people people feel about her and that some suspect she was an accomplice. She's so despicable that that's totally understandable. That said, imho, she was a predatory, selfish homewrecker and not a murderer. When she asked those questions (yoga studio, dog's name) I think she had really believed (and hoped!) that Shanna left, up to that point, and was just beginning to suspect that something worse had happened. She was worried about being exposed as a ho, not a murderer or accomplice. I don't think she was sure and she may have thought it was Shannon or the cops with Chris' phone. On Monday, she believed Chris about Shannan leaving with the kids (and she was glad!). Once she saw Chris on TV, didn't ask him why the media was there? That indicates, to me, she didn't know what was up and then it began to sink in and she got paranoid.
I don't think Chris had a plan for the car. If he had, he would have gone to the site, ditched his family (as he did) and then called the office, saying he was sick or something, and had to go home. He would have then met NK and ditched the car. But he didn't, which indicates, to me, his ONLY plan was getting his family gone so he could be with NK. He didn't even think it through, beyond that. I think that's why he cracked so fast - unlike some other killers who don't.
I don't know if you followed the Kelsey Berreth case where the other woman actually was an accomplice, after the fact (witnessed burning the body, destroyed evidence, cleaned the bloody murder scene and even lurked around to kill Kelsey, herself, prior to the actual perp killing her). Everyone hates her guts (she got a sweet plea deal to testify) and many want her to be guilty of the actual murder, but she wasn't. NK doesn't even come close to that, imo. I don't think she would have done anything like help dispose of Shannan's car, for two reasons: I don't think she would want to implicate herself in a crime and I don't she wanted a family annihilator for a boyfriend. She just wanted to steal Chris from his family and have her happily ever after, broken hearts be damned.
Given they had video showing CW walking back and forth loading his truck and that same video proved there was no other possible way they could have left that house, I believe that more than met the "reasonable suspicion" threshold required for police to detain him in Colorado, which could have preserved a probable crime scene.
And no, I don't believe the police should have already known everyone was already dead at that point, which is why they should have acted quickly that same day. IMO
I believe the video proves exactly that, meeting the reasonable suspicion threshold.Emphasis mine.
That's where you're mistaken because that video did NOT prove that. Yes, it was suspicious but it wasn't proof and there are other ways she could have left that house, like walking out the door and leaving with someone else. Police cannot arrest or detain without evidence. Believe me, you don't want to live in a society where they can.
Investigations take a little or a lot of time. They got him to confess so fast that they never had to commence a search or develop evidence. Their successful interrogation got him to hand it all over.
The difference between the two terms is that probable cause means there is concrete evidence of a crime, whereas reasonable suspicion is open to broader interpretation. Reasonable suspicion indicates that it appears that a crime has been committed; the phrase often is used to justify investigation into suspicious behavior when a crime may have been committed.
- Reasonable suspicion is a reasonable presumption that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed. It is a reasonable belief based on facts or circumstances and is informed by a police officer’s training and experience. Reasonable suspicion is seen as more than a guess or hunch but less than probable cause.
- Probable cause is the logical belief, supported by facts and circumstances, that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed.
When Do the Police Need Probable Cause?
The police need only reasonable suspicion to stop an individual and question him or her, and they may search for weapons if they believe that the person is armed or presents an imminent threat of bodily harm. Probable cause must exist for the police to be able to arrest someone or obtain a search warrant.
Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause: What’s the Difference?
My main point in bringing up the yoga and dog questions was to point out just one of the obvious errors made by the detectives during the prison interview. That same error was even carried over to the redacted transcript. I have no experience in law or LE, but I do oversee financial audits of major corporations for a living, so I'm extremely focused on searching for errors and irregularities.
I'm not claiming that he definitely had a plan to dispose of Shanann's Lexus SUV, but it's been obvious to most of us here on WS's from the beginning that he planned their murders, which he finally confirmed in his letters to Cheryl Cadle. I just think the detectives should have followed up on that possibility, among other things.
ETA:
I also believe CW was well aware of the truck GPS, so even a stupid criminal like him should have realized LE was going to be inevitably led to CERVI 319. He probably thought if they found the Lexus abandoned elsewhere they wouldn't bother to check his worksite.
I believe the video proves exactly that, meeting the reasonable suspicion threshold.
The front door was latched from the inside, making it impossible for her to leave in that way. If she left through the garage the video would have captured them leaving.
It is not reasonable to claim that they might have left through the back door and climbed over the backyard fence, but IIRC even the back door was locked from the inside.
http://aclu-co.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/KYR-Colorado.pdfYou're driving me crazy with that "reasonable suspicion"! LE has to have probable cause to detain or arrest and that is a higher threshold.
I think you're failing to take into account how fast this all went down. He confessed within two days. Had he not, they would certainly have searched his work site and arrested him.
As for the car, there is no evidence he planned to ditch it because he never would have left work that day had NA not gotten involved. Yes, he planned the murders but it doesn't seem as though he could see beyond that immediate gratification of being without a wife and kids to "be with Nikki".
http://aclu-co.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/KYR-Colorado.pdf
In Colorado, a police officer may detain you for a reasonable period of time if he or she has a reasonable suspicion that you are involved in criminal activity. 4 Being detained is not a full arrest, though an arrest could follow.
You wrote: As for the car, there is no evidence he planned to ditch it because he never would have left work that day had NA not gotten involved.
That's why I said he should have been questioned about the car because it might have turned up whether he had an accomplice or not.