Is there a way to delete your posts? I'm still getting my head around it, sorry.
Not sure where you are getting info. that WT was a nervous little child? I have not read anything like that. WT was removed from his biological parents as a few months old baby, so his personality was not even formed much at that age yet. He wouldn't of even been walking yet. I think people IMO are making a lot of assumptions when no one really knows much about the dynamics of the poor little boy's situation from the start until his going missing. It would probably take a child psychologist to determine what was really going on with WT, other than him just being an energetic little boy. All IMO.I think they were welcoming that, if also sometimes finding it a challenge. Apparently he'd been an extremely nervous little child, also natural in view of his background, and was just gaining confidence.
No delete option as such. You can use Edit to remove your text, replace it with the word Deleted. Or you can use the Report button to ask a moderator to delete because of triplication by mistake. Or you can just leave it, no big deal.There is an edit button, but I cannot see any delete option.
William's foster parents talked about what he was like in early videos. As to whether it's at all related to his experiences in his first three years, that was my speculation and you're welcome to differ; for the record, I'm not a child psychologist.Not sure where you are getting info. that WT was a nervous little child? I have not read anything like that. WT was removed from his biological parents as a few months old baby, so his personality was not even formed much at that age yet. He wouldn't of even been walking yet. I think people IMO are making a lot of assumptions when no one really knows much about the dynamics of the poor little boy's situation from the start until his going missing. It would probably take a child psychologist to determine what was really going on with WT, other than him just being an energetic little boy. All IMO.
There is an edit button, but I cannot see any delete option.
I am not suggesting anything untoward, but I do get the feeling that the foster parents, especially the FFC found William very boisterous. The FGM also referred to him being loud. Just a normal little boy I would say, who had had a confusing start in his young life...
Thank you for some commonsense, SA.Somehow I don't think that any boisterous behaviour by William led to his demise.
In fact, if he was more boisterous and loud perhaps he would have yelled out, struggled - if he could - and not been taken. Instead, he was said to be a bit shy. Which I think would make an easier target for an abductor.
Thank you for some commonsense, SA.
I’m really sad that people can still make veiled accusations against the ff, despite TOS.
No offence but this is all your own opinion. Only facts are that FGM on that particular day “thought William was being very boisterous and loud”, but the foster mother had replied “he’s a boy, that’s just how they are”.I am not suggesting anything untoward, but I do get the feeling that the foster parents, especially the FFC found William very boisterous. The FGM also referred to him being loud. Just a normal little boy I would say, who had had a confusing start in his young life...
KateM,I have heard that in the early days of the Inquest, it was reported that the foster carers were finding William hard to handle and were making enquiries about handing him back? I don't know if there is any truth in it, or whether it's just Chinese whispers? It does contradict other reports that say that the foster parents were in the process of applying to adopt both William and his sister. Has anyone here heard anything regarding this?
..... or prompting a chorus of complaints from some members .....
All we know is that there was some kind of behavioural problem with WT per linked MSM articles, and why would we need to know that per MSM? What is it that MSM are putting that out there meant to insinuate? No one as i see it is ragging on the foster carers, just discussing what has been put out there in this case by the media. All IMO.Maybe many of us believe the police when they repeatedly say that the foster parents are cleared - as well as many of us abiding by the TOS - and we don't wish the foster parents to be caused any additional and unnecessary grief, innuendo, or publicity.
Are people here suggesting that William was a boisterous little problem child, so an abductor came along and stole him?
.
BBM In what way?I have obviously ruffled some feathers.
I haven't made any accusations against the foster parents at all, however I find the FFC's account of the cars being parked over the road concerning, as no-one else appears to have seen them.
PS is a worry IMO.
BBM In what way?
Please see bolded section.Do you mean the FFC's recall of the cars, or PS being a concern?
Do you mean the FFC's recall of the cars, or PS being a concern?