afitzy
Former Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 11,285
- Reaction score
- 126,552
I actually spent the time and read the Pattisville/Atty. P/Atty BM and Atty Weinstein closing argument documents twice.
Then, I started to write a factually based post about some of the issues at hand and then questioned seriously whether it was even worth the time given that YET AGAIN the Civil Case (like the Family Court case before it) is tainted with untruths and shaded truths IMO (and as clearly documented by Atty Weinstein in his brilliantly crafted motion) by Fd.
To see ongoing mistruths/shaded truths and outright lying from a Defendant under oath is something that I am having a lot of difficulty with as we watch the CT Courts operate. Taking the oath to tell the truth and the WHOLE TRUTH when on the stand is a fundamental aspect of the US judicial system and it seems Fd simply doesn't care as he seems to have his own delusional understanding of the truth. I do very much wonder whether Fd has the ability to tell truth from lie? I think Judge Heller also questioned Fd's ability to tell the truth and so she ruled accordingly in Family Court. I hope Judge Noble take a tip from Judge Heller and rules accordingly in the Civil Case. I also wonder whether Fd is simply a pathological liar? IDK but truth at best is a convenient concept in the mind of Fd IMO.
So, rather than a factual post I found a holiday oriented picture which IMO summarises the situation in the Civil Court testimony of Fd and the farcical closing motion put forward by Pattisville on behalf of FD.
Happy Holidays to ALL HERE!
MOO