True, and this reminds me that at least one person who LE wanted to interview had refused to speak to them, per TPS at the Ont. Court of Justice hearing last April. That certainly sends up a red flag.
I wonder if LE was ever successful in speaking to that person(s) (and others, who LE could not locate possible because they left Canada). If you refuse to speak to LE in a murder investigation, they will immediately zero in on you as a POI and investigate the hell out of you. At the same hearing, LE stated that they have a working theory, and an idea of what happened. That is a confident, bold statement to make, if it is true.
I have to wonder if the above noted, unnamed person(s) who refused to speak to LE provided a direction in the investigation which has turned out to be very productive. It seems that LE want more evidence to make an arrest, but it sounds positive imo.
Barry and Honey Sherman murder case: Police have working theory and ‘an idea of what happened’ | The Star
In general, I think wealthy people should not discuss changes to their wills that may threaten heirs, or impact business arrangements, in some way. In my opinion, if Barry and Honey Sherman had not talked about changing their wills, leaving most of it to charity, and making other decisions even in the near future, like possibly Honey giving 500 million to her sister Mary, they might both still be alive today.
I am reminded of the Dellen Millard case. He shot his father, and was successful for a period of time making it look like a suicide. He wanted his inheritance right away, and was afraid that if his father remarried, (new will ? ) or continued to make investments in his new aviation business, that he would loose financially. Just saying ... all speculation, and my opinion, only.