SpanishMossAntiques
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2017
- Messages
- 702
- Reaction score
- 2,216
Another thing that irks me is that this woman was a Jane Doe or as they are calling her, Doe Jo, the hospital releases her without her having a clue as to who she is, this is so negligent of them. Just one more thing to add, with the situation the lady was living in and struggling with mental illness, is it possible that she may have had a record for maybe loitering or vagrancy or something along those lines? Did they take her fingerprints? The
Again, it is not negligent of a hospital to let a patient that is not on a psychiatric hold (or after she was on a hold for 3 days - at which point the hospital would have to definitively prove that she is either a danger to herself or others; and no, she's not a danger to herself simply because she has lice). An adult is not legally required to provide the hospital with her name, or any other information. In fact, many people here illegally will go to the hospital for treatment and give a generic name, or no name at all, and they'll say they forgot their Social Security Number, etc. But yes, it is standard practice for police to take fingerprints if the body has not putrefied, and the homicide investigators along with the ME and/or the medicolegal investigator will contact local homeless shelters, hospitals, search police reports, police contact records, police calls, etc. (They will often keep this information classified, on a 'need-to-know' basis, so it generally won't be published in the media unless they determine that doing so will not compromise their investigation or will produce some leads.) A few pieces of advice here: If you're genuinely interested in searching for clues in missing person cases, or trying to put a name to the unidentified, it would be worth your time to learn basic police procedure, and, how to use the various databases out there in this regard. It's important to avoid making assumptions about the missing person, etc. as well - in my previous career when I'd be assigned a complex investigation (involving numerous subjects/suspects), my Lieutenant would say to me, "Hannah, don't forget that you can find everyone guilty of something when you make assumptions - but when you follow the objective evidence in a case it will always lead you to the truth". While based on the way this UID was apparently living she probably was suffering from mental illness. But, I can think of a thousand other reasons for her to present the way she did... What evidence did you discover that she did not travel very far? Someone who is motivated can walk 20+ miles per day... What makes you believe she did not hitchhike or else maybe hop a train? Here in Chicago if I see someone elderly or maybe otherwise vulnerable walking in the rain or bitter cold I was always offer them a ride to wherever it they are going... So, she potentially could have indeed traveled quite a distance. It's important never to underestimate what people can accomplish; humans are extremely creative and adaptable! So, try not to impose your ideals on the subject of your investigation. Instead, jump into that rabbit hole and follow it as far as it goes...