They originally claimed on their website to be "internationally protected persons, entitled to security around the globe", but they had to change that rapidly when it was pointed out that would no longer apply after 3/31.Yes, but my point was did they actually request if the USA was willing to pay for security? I doubt it. I don’t think so. And, now it just looks like a mud sling fest in a mean tweet. It is embarrassing and illinformed. And don’t we have other things to do over here in the middle of a pandemic?