I think he lied about sleeping with her ashes. He claimed to never take them out of the box and said "look how beat up the box is" and I didn't think it was beat up at all. He got those ashes and shoved them in the closet. Doesnt care about them but doesn't want the son to have them. And his saying 'I have her'. Creepy McCreeperson for sure. I am leaning towards him or that serial killer who confessed to throwing her off the bridge.
Though, I also wondered if her last client was looked at. He left and got call as he was leaving and she got call about same time and was short with caller and distracted. The actor they used had longish white hair which could be confused as a woman....the one eye witness lady said she saw women other eye witness said man with shoulder length hair.
Would like to know if the husband or the last client or that serial killer drove a blue car like described?
The “I have her” line seals it, IMO. That choice of verb, whether conscious or unconscious, revealed more than he ever intended to reveal.
“Have” is a possessive verb. If you “have” something it is yours. You own it. He easily could have replaced “I have her” with “she is all mine”. The friends and family say throughout the episode that he wanted her all to himself and was jealous of literally anyone else having a relationship with her. He denies that, but then just proves what they said was totally true when he can’t help himself with the “I have her” line. Chilling.
Things that NORMAL grieving relatives say about murdered loved ones include “she is back home where she is loved”, “she is finally back with us at rest”, etc. But this absolute creep made sure to say “I have her”.
He danced with her skull and held her bag of ashes, almost as if he was telling her one last time “you will never get away from me, you will always be mine”. He locked her son out of the house the day after she disappeared and prevented him from getting any remembrances of his mother. That is beyond petty, it’s downright punitive. It is blatantly OBVIOUS to anyone with even the slightest idea about how the human mind works that what her friends and son said were 100% true- he absolutely despised her son due to the attention she showed him and “stole” from him. The horrible treatment he gave the son with the snide and crude insults while she was alive is just further proof he truly hated that kid. He couldn’t even hide his hatred in the interview. He just had to mention one last time the one person who will never have her ashes... her son. Over-the-top filled with hate.
And he practically gloated in the interview and dared any of her friends and relatives to somehow prove it was him. People don’t get that defensive and almost threatening during interviews, even wrongly accused ones. It was like he was doing all he could not to explode on camera. Several times it looked like he was shaking.
Just listen to how the son, sister, and two close friends speak about her throughout the show and contrast it to how he speaks about her. The difference is obvious.
Last thing I’ll say is that it is extremely telling that he straight up lied on camera and said that they never argued and that their marriage was very happy. The son said he saw them fight constantly, and he has no reason to lie. Furthermore, her friends and relatives all said she was so unhappy with him, that she was going to divorce him, and that she told them so. Again, why would they lie? It’s obvious they argued. It’s obvious she really was wanting to leave him. An innocent man would just tell the truth- “well, yeah, we did have our share of arguments and we were going through a bit of a rocky patch before she disappeared, but I was hoping we could make it work”. That’s all he had to say. ALL marriages, even the happiest of ones, have their share of minor quarrels here and there. To deny any and all strife in the marriage makes him look far guiltier than if he had just copped to some arguments. You’d think someone who “studied criminology” (just slightly narcissistic bragging there) would have known that.