His guns were not taken away from him. The guns were seized pursuant to the SW in the matter of his missing wife. The guns of the January SW would allegedly have been on the premises of the home when his wife went missing.That’s what made me sit up and go “wait a minute”. He bought more guns after his guns were taken away.
Why would he do that? Not one gun, but two?
What am I missing?
There really was nothing legally prohibiting LM from purchasing more guns - now there is with the GVRO. Is it correct that since January, LE never charged LM with any crimes related to missing, improper transfer, unregistered and illegal in CA types, for these guns? It could be a very long list of charges just on the guns, item by item and each point a charge. Maybe there is a plan. JMO