DizzyB
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
- Messages
- 3,020
- Reaction score
- 51,361
I had the distinct impression he was referring to all the busybodies on youtube & facebook pretending to be investigative journalists or undercover cops, but all they're actually doing is exploiting the situation so they can repeat the abundance of rumors, gossip and speculation, as if it's fact - and generate more followers/likes/social media clout.
I'm pretty sure everyone following this case for the last year, knows exactly the kind of sites and users I'm talking about. For general reference, not a single one of those kinds of sites is allowed here, because this is a fact based forum that respects the victims and their families.
jmo
I watched and I agree with you that it was what Tom was inferring, but I did cringe a little when he said it. He was saying it on a YouTube crime channel hosted by a now private citizen. The reason that the channel exists at all is because people are interested in true crime. They don’t just want to hear Mike talk about it-they want to participate in the channel. He put up a whole evidentiary map of Suzanne’s case. I get what Tom meant-let LE do their job and don’t interfere.
I was glad to hear more about Suzanne, and I appreciate a bit more insight into the family dynamic. Lots of siblings and step siblings and each person has their own unique personality.