You have to look at each of these individually , its possible that not all of these are linked
The first 4 cases all bear a striking resemblance, to each other, all bear the earmarks of a serial child killer in that area at the time, this is even more convincing in that the first 2 victims (Spinks/Johnson) are both killed in the same manner , (surmised in the case, of Johnson) found only 15 feet from each other though 3 months apart.
An anonymous caller gave details about the location of Johnson which LE feels only the killer would know . If indeed this was the individual responsible it gives us a look into his psyche, in which he wanted his victims found .
But why?, to claim responsibility? or because he felt remorse ?
Brenda Crockett is a very interesting case, in which she was made to call her family by whom we assume was her killer who made a point to make sure the victims family knew it was a "white man who picked her up"
Again what was the purpose of this call? to antagonize, her family? or to allow his victim one last conversation with her family? Or to buy time ?
Now while the majority of child abduction killers are white males, as with the Atlanta child killings, I feel a white male prowling around in a predominantly black neighborhood trying to abduct young black females, would've stuck out like a sore thumb, especially after this case.
Though the old adage that serial killers usually target their own race is mostly true, its even more so when it comes to Serial killers who target children,
Therefore I feel this factor was purely to mislead LE, and that the individual responsible in at least the first 4 cases, was a black male.
And you need to consider why an individual would stress that a victims family know the race of the killer to begin with , theres no reason if they only planned to kill their victim, its too out of place .
Nenomoshia Yates case, of all shows us the sexual motivation of the killer, as her body is found only 3 hours after her disappearance, as with most Child abduction killings , the victim is usually killed within the first 30-90 minutes after they are abducted, the killer in this case, had no time to so anything else nor did he want to . He did what he wanted and got away as quickly as possible (hence why time is so important in abduction cases)
The 5th victim (Brenda Woodward) also the oldest victim at 18 is interesting and different, in which this victim is not sexually assaulted and is stabbed, now perhaps this was because she was older, stronger, and perhaps struggled with her killer, and he did what he needed to to control the situation, but theres no sexual assault listed, and unlike the other victims, she was covered up indicating perhaps remorse, or discomfort with this particular victim. But it can also have another meaning , in which the victim knows the killer
The lack of sexual assault is also interesting, was she too old for his liking? if that's the case, then why even abduct this particular victim, most Child killers abduct their victims based, on their apparent age , size, and lack of an adult presence, but the motive , is OVERWHELMINGLY sexual in those cases, this case at least to me seems out of sorts with the first 4, but we can only base this on what we know from the media .
Then theres the note.......
The killer never tried to contact police before , (unless you count the Johnson case) or after, but did allow one victim to call her family, there was no attempts made to contact the media, nobody looking for credit in any of these other crimes.
"this is tAntAmount to my
insensititivity to people
especiAlly women.
I will Admit the others
wheN you cAtch me iF you cAn!
FRee-wAy PhanTom"
The writer of this note is explaining his reason for this particular murder, but details nothing on any of the others, other than saying hell cop to them if hes caught , he wants the reader to know that he has an issue with people , women in particular.
"Women", if we are to believe this was the same killer , the youngest victim was 10
Now there are specific types of child molestors who molest child victims, because they physically desire adults, but cant because of their social awkwardness, and fear of adult interaction, but they are RARELY if ever violent , so were the first 4 victims a surrogate for his anger ?... I tend to think not , as the sexual component seems to be the key in the first 4 homicides, the victims were killed then discarded .
In the first 4 cases, the victims are all found dressed but missing shoes, in the 5th case, this ceases as Woodard is found with her shoes still on .
Now there have been cases, where child killers have gone onto become serial killers of adults (Arthur Shawcross for ex) , but the motivations were always the same, whats tough to pin down here , was the age of the last 2 victims a factor in why they were not sexually assaulted ?
I dont think so
Being that the motives in the first 4 homicides were indeed sexual , not apparently anger motivated , and that this victim, who receives the most violent trauma of all 6 is not sexually assaulted, as with the previous 4 victims, where their shoes were missing, and not this victim, I'm inclined, based on these factors to say perhaps this killer was not involved in the first 4 and that the note claiming to be the same killer may just be throw LE off, but given what we are working with I could be wrong
The last victim Dianne Williams theres little case, info on, she went to visit her boyfriend was, last seen (by whom?) getting on a bus, shes found strangled just a few hours later , semen is recovered from the victim, except its "assumed" to be from her boyfriend . Her shoes however are missing
Its possible this case may not be related either , as the only the common factors, victim is a black female, and her shoes are missing, sexual assault is up in the air .
All of this occurs within a year and a half , so within 18 months a killer went from abducting and raping young girls to apparently abducting older teens from bus stops with no sexual assault, could happen ... but seems a little too abrupt
Is it possible the killer began to enjoy killing more than rape?.. it has happened , often with sadistic killers where sex becomes less and less a factor
Again I feel the first 4 victims are indeed the work of the same killer, particularly the first 2 , i'm on the fence with the last 2