Thank you. I'll read your translations again.I translated both in the previous thread. Hope this helps as I am in a hurry now and cannot give your questions the attention they deserve, sorry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you. I'll read your translations again.I translated both in the previous thread. Hope this helps as I am in a hurry now and cannot give your questions the attention they deserve, sorry.
Right. I meant to reply to this on the previous thread.
I think your yellow line is much too far from the ridge. It's hard to judge scales by eye, and of course there are distortions inherent in Google Earth, but the big square block on the slope below the summit looks to be about 100m from the summit, according to géoportail. The distance from the path to Federico_A's point X is likewise about 100m. That would put your your line more like 50-100m from the ridge.
Not a native spreaker, but IMO, a 'piton rocheaux', in the hiking/climbing world, means a peak above a near-vertical rock wall. A climber ascends the piton by driving in artificial spikes for footholds and using ropes with partners. (deleted remark about going down a piton)Are there any native French speakers in the house?
I'm puzzling over a couple of remarks made by the procureur, M. Amunzateguy, as reported in the French media.
The first is that "Le corps a été découvert en bas d’une sorte de piton rocheux". I presume the suggestion is that Esther had been on that pinnacle ("piton") when she fell. But would that refer to the Pic de la Glère itself, or to some sub-peak below it?
The second is that "C'est une zone où il faut être un sacré montagnard pour y aller". Is that a general remark about the nature of the terrain in the high Pyrenees, or does it seem to refer to the specific location of her body?
Pyrénées. Mort d'Esther Dingley : la blogueuse anglaise a très certainement été victime d'un accident | Actu Toulouse
Disparition d'Esther Dingley : l'autopsie confirme l'hypothèse de la chute mortelle
This is a google earth link so you can play around with the view angles of the site:
http://www.grpdesbf.nl/esfr-mapdata...a-331-332-shortcut-via-lacdelamontagnette.kml
It's the Esther Dingley area - with the pink trail being the shortcut from Refuge Vanesque to the base of Port de la Glere path
I found the shadows hadn't been added into earlier imagery on Google Earth, so you can view the face back in time. For example, here from 2006 with the yellow pin behind, showing the point that people have been suggesting she may have left the path to access the Pic from. The face might be a bit different now though of course!
I think I'm looking for the kinds of nuances and subtexts that a native speaker might pick up that I might miss. None of the news sources seems to be quoting M. Amunzateguy's statement in its entirety, so it's a question of putting together bits and pieces. A Google image search for "piton rocheux" gives a fair idea of the kinds of formations that might be described in that way, but the description strikes me as implying a fall from a pinnacle, not simply to a point below one. But again, these are the things a native speaker might be more attuned to.Not a native spreaker, but IMO, a 'piton rocheaux', in the hiking/climbing world, means a peak above a near-vertical rock wall. A climber ascends the piton by driving in artificial spikes for footholds and using ropes with partners. (deleted remark about going down a piton)
Most pitons are just along one side of the maintain, often there is a gentle slope on the other side that can be hiked without equipment. This is because of the geology of mountain building through plate tectonics. Climbers, being ornery, choose to go up the rock wall.
ETA, there's no suggestion she fell from a major peak, as the piton wasn't named. Probably it was just a small outcrop along the mountain since it wasn't particulary high off the trail where remains were first found.
I think the reference to the techical difficulty refers to where she was found. IMO this shows she was very unlikely to have walked to where she died, or been dragged there by a bear or human.
This would explain why the area wasn't searched before, or encountered by other hikers. Luckily, Dan found it without killing himself in the process. That's why SAR often ask family not to search, but evidently there was no stopping Dan, his devotion to Esther was, IMO, unlimited.
There are a few suggestions in the last few pages of this thread. But the view from the Port isn't wide open. The path takes a sharp bend up a series of switchbacks as it enters the Port, and the view back down the trail is obscured.Does anyone have any thoughts on why a person would head to the ledge (assuming that's what she did) by leaving the trail? She wouldn't gain much of a view compared to just approaching the Port, which has a wide open view of the valley below.
Here's a view along that ridge:Anyone have any thoughts if she maybe approached from the other side, i.e. along the ridgeline?
Oxford graduate and experienced hiker Esther, 37, is believed to have fallen after making a fatal miscalculation as she descended the then snow-covered pass last November.
Not sure what to think of this.
Esther had been to the Pic de Sauvegarde before, why would she make THAT mistake all of a sudden? The Refuge de Venasque (if that is what they are hinting at) was within sight and the weather was good, the snow came later.
I still can't get my head round why Esther attempted to go up the Pic de la Glere. I've listed some reasons below but maybe I am missing things, or wrong.
Was she climbing up the Pic from the French side, or did she fall from the top after entering Spain? Or even, was she in Spain the whole time?
If she was on the way to the Port de la Glere from France, she'd have had to be lost to head up the Pic , and unable to assess the danger for some reason (darkness or poor visibility).
If she was coming from the Spanish side, she'd also have to be lost.
I'm presuming she went up the path to the Port from France, and then into Spain. I've listed some reasons (not mutually exclusive) as to why she might have gone off the main path at this point, and headed up the Pic:-
1) To Shelter - (I think I read that there was some snow the evening she was assumed to have been trying the route, 23rd Nov. 2020)
This is my best guess, and that she later became hypothermic and disorientated.
It could have been temporary shelter, or for an overnight bivouac (if she was late arriving at the Port de la Glere) or even a permanent stop due to injury/exhaustion.
The tent should therefore be somewhere over the Spanish side (unless she was really unaware of the risks beyond the ridge and walked over it to pitch)
2) Chased there, or she was scared of something nearby (it being the only place to gain shelter or height)
3) To try and get a phone signal
4) To get a view/photo of Spain and France, and possibly a selfie
5) Climb one last mountain before heading for home
6) She got onto a different path by mistake (but even in poor visibility, surely she'd know that the path shouldn't be going steeply upwards?)
7) Voluntary fall
Any other scenarios?
I'm leaning towards Esther telling Dan exactly what she was doing. It just took him a long time to hear what she said (Dossier p. 7).
Still in the same area.I read that as saying that she remained in Spain overnight Nov 22. On Nov 23, she hiked in Spain to Port de la Glere. At that location, she dipped into France - exactly where her body was found.
Tomorrow heading for Port de le Glere
Might dip into France.
Hoping Refuge Venasque has a winter room.
She hoped that there is a Winter room at the Refuge de Venasque, but, if she really cared to know, it's no more than a 3 minute search of the Refuge de Venasque website to know that there is a Winter room.
She stated that she would be out of wifi range for a few days and not to worry. However, Dan quickly discovered that there is good wifi signal throughout the area (excluding Refuge de Venasque).
Yes, I think she did this. Her message was a bit vague (probably because she knew she shouldn't go into France and didn't want hard evidence on her phone) but I bet she told Dan more precisely, hence he was so sure.
RSBM and BBM, no I'm not sure what to make of it either. After going to the trouble of a "nine-hour mission" they don't seen to have offered much. They think she was descending at Port de la Glere? That would imply the unlikely westward ridge route again. So what refuge are they on about that she was attempting to reach?
Also the map/diagram thingy has the skull and body south east of Sauvegarde, somewhere around the Cabane de Besurta. They really don't seem to have a clue about the geography.
I still can't get my head round why Esther attempted to go up the Pic de la Glere. I've listed some reasons below but maybe I am missing things, or wrong.
Was she climbing up the Pic from the French side, or did she fall from the top after entering Spain? Or even, was she in Spain the whole time?
If she was on the way to the Port de la Glere from France, she'd have had to be lost to head up the Pic , and unable to assess the danger for some reason (darkness or poor visibility).
If she was coming from the Spanish side, she'd also have to be lost.
I'm presuming she went up the path to the Port from France, and then into Spain. I've listed some reasons (not mutually exclusive) as to why she might have gone off the main path at this point, and headed up the Pic:-
1) To Shelter - (I think I read that there was some snow the evening she was assumed to have been trying the route, 23rd Nov. 2020)
This is my best guess, and that she later became hypothermic and disorientated.
It could have been temporary shelter, or for an overnight bivouac (if she was late arriving at the Port de la Glere) or even a permanent stop due to injury/exhaustion.
The tent should therefore be somewhere over the Spanish side (unless she was really unaware of the risks beyond the ridge and walked over it to pitch)
2) Chased there, or she was scared of something nearby (it being the only place to gain shelter or height)
3) To try and get a phone signal
4) To get a view/photo of Spain and France, and possibly a selfie
5) Climb one last mountain before heading for home
6) She got onto a different path by mistake (but even in poor visibility, surely she'd know that the path shouldn't be going steeply upwards?)
7) Voluntary fall
Any other scenarios?