MrsWatson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2018
- Messages
- 7,879
- Reaction score
- 64,392
Huh?
DBM=deleted by me
Huh?
Police dig up land close to where missing chef Claudia Lawrence was last seen
Update:
This morning, two officers marked off a 700-foot stretch of land near the gravel pits in Sand Hutton, a village only eight miles from Claudia's home in York.
They dug up a single three foot deep hole, while around 40 officers remained in the area searching the ground with sticks.
pond is drained too, there’s pics in the link.
The misogynistic and sensationalist way the press framed CL’s romantic life was the issue. Her relationships should of course be a significant interest, but it’s such a thorny subject in light of the press’ presentation. It biased so many minds.Ummm, why not?
She had a complicated love life. All sorts of motives there.
Exactly. This was victim shaming at it’s finest. I have always questioned where this information come from in the first place and it’s relevance - the people involved in her murder perhaps?
Yep - not messing around, looks like they might fully drain it.
Do we know whetherthe 3 foot hole is somewhere on the site of the previous timber structure / silage pit that Shadwell has determined was built between 2007 and 2011 ?
Out Foxed
New bloodhounds looking at this case - what’s your thoughts on what happened to CL? Old hands sometimes can’t see the wood for the trees - I’d be interested in your take - 18th or 19th?
One of the four or are police barking up the wrong tree?
I think the night of the 18th. The last message from her phone (that we know about) seemed to be out of character and also containing wrong information. Did she send it hoping someone would realise it was wrong or did someone else send it to try and make sure nobody was overly concerned about her absence - she was tired from long shifts at work - and to buy them time to make a plan.
Also, she started a conversation by text with the friend in Cyprus and never responded to his last message. Given that she started the conversation, would she not have checked her messages and replied the next morning before leaving for work?
It’s odd that there seemed to be quite a few CCTV cameras on shops and private properties that caught her walking towards home on 18th yet nothing at all on the morning of 19th? Even if there were no cameras specifically showing the front door of her house were there any that would have picked her up getting into a car or when she got to the road if she left via the alleyway at the back? Would anyone drive to the back of the house to pick her up or was someone staying with her and parking in the NH which had no working CCTV.
If we are to believe her work colleague she spent the night of 17th with a new boyfriend. Was it just the case that the straighteners were left in her rucksack from that night and she’d leave it by the door to pick up when she left for work the next morning.
I’ve always believed she was taken out of the house via the alleyway and NH carpark and then the house was staged to look like she’d left for work. The thing I’m interested in is the way the it was left. Her mother said that she wouldn’t have worn the slippers which were left by the door and the hair dye seemed to be out of place if she’d just had her hair coloured elsewhere? Were those slippers left there because the others were with Claudia? It would make sense of her belongings such as handbag, charger etc being at home and just her rucksack and chef clothes missing along with the straighteners if she’d had them at work with her that day having stayed a boyfriends house on the 17th.
I don’t think she left for work on 19th. I think that’s when she was taken away from the house before someone went in to clean up. Easy enough to just pick up her rucksack and any other incriminating items and dispose of them. With her not being reported missing until 20th, there’d be plenty of time to dispose of her belongings somewhere completely different to where they left her.
What was said in Claudia's last text?I think the night of the 18th. The last message from her phone (that we know about) seemed to be out of character and also containing wrong information. Did she send it hoping someone would realise it was wrong or did someone else send it to try and make sure nobody was overly concerned about her absence - she was tired from long shifts at work - and to buy them time to make a plan.
Also, she started a conversation by text with the friend in Cyprus and never responded to his last message. Given that she started the conversation, would she not have checked her messages and replied the next morning before leaving for work?
It’s odd that there seemed to be quite a few CCTV cameras on shops and private properties that caught her walking towards home on 18th yet nothing at all on the morning of 19th? Even if there were no cameras specifically showing the front door of her house were there any that would have picked her up getting into a car or when she got to the road if she left via the alleyway at the back? Would anyone drive to the back of the house to pick her up or was someone staying with her and parking in the NH which had no working CCTV.
If we are to believe her work colleague she spent the night of 17th with a new boyfriend. Was it just the case that the straighteners were left in her rucksack from that night and she’d leave it by the door to pick up when she left for work the next morning.
I’ve always believed she was taken out of the house via the alleyway and NH carpark and then the house was staged to look like she’d left for work. The thing I’m interested in is the way the it was left. Her mother said that she wouldn’t have worn the slippers which were left by the door and the hair dye seemed to be out of place if she’d just had her hair coloured elsewhere? Were those slippers left there because the others were with Claudia? It would make sense of her belongings such as handbag, charger etc being at home and just her rucksack and chef clothes missing along with the straighteners if she’d had them at work with her that day having stayed a boyfriends house on the 17th.
I don’t think she left for work on 19th. I think that’s when she was taken away from the house before someone went in to clean up. Easy enough to just pick up her rucksack and any other incriminating items and dispose of them. With her not being reported missing until 20th, there’d be plenty of time to dispose of her belongings somewhere completely different to where they left her.
Newbie here. Read a lot (but not all) of the previous posts on this case. Although I don't live in York the case has always intrigued me due to the nature of the disappearance and the vicinity of her house to what must have been a busy road with a pub nearby.
Anyway, I was interested to delve back on some information regarding the last ping of her mobile when it was switched off at 12:10pm on 19th March 2009. The image below (courtesy of The Sunday Times) shows that the phone mast near York Uni had a 9 mile range which extended to Tockwith. However, it's not a 360° radius from the mast it's only 120°. Does anyone know of a more accurate map showing the 120° that the mast covered and does this include the area at the Sand Hutton gravel pits?
Im very interested in seeing the location of this camera is it visible from a Google street walk?
Oh. I didn't realise the sector was that narrow. If you look at the pic you posted it mentions Tockwith Village, which is in the opposite direction of the gravel pits. However, I am not sure whether the ST article is accurate or is just generalising.Newbie here. Read a lot (but not all) of the previous posts on this case. Although I don't live in York the case has always intrigued me due to the nature of the disappearance and the vicinity of her house to what must have been a busy road with a pub nearby.
Anyway, I was interested to delve back on some information regarding the last ping of her mobile when it was switched off at 12:10pm on 19th March 2009. The image below (courtesy of The Sunday Times) shows that the phone mast near York Uni had a 9 mile range which extended to Tockwith. However, it's not a 360° radius from the mast it's only 120°. Does anyone know of a more accurate map showing the 120° that the mast covered and does this include the area at the Sand Hutton gravel pits?
Yes, it is a possibility that they are the murder weapon. I don't think she took them to work with her.Could her straightners have been used as a murder weapon and that's why they are missing i just find it pretty strange she didn't take any money or a bank card but took her straightners with her so that to me means she was planning on going out after her shift or did she always take them to work with her. I really hope the family get the answers they deserve.