RAISINISBACK
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 4,617
- Reaction score
- 21,528
I 100 percent agree it would have barely been dark (as many of us discussed months back in the threads) and this is important.
I had originally researched to find similar cases and the most similar one I found where a family member was not the perpetrator, it was a couple of meth heads who robbed a father and daughter and shot them. Given the meth problem in the area, I was heavily weighing this option, but the fact that it wasn’t REALLY dark yet made a big difference in my thinking. Of course fast forward three months and we have uncovered a lot of additional info. But I just wanted to emphasize, that this was very early for any crime that desired to be under cover of darkness. It reads more like a very sloppy and extended cocktail hour gone wrong. As much as I like my old meth robbery theory. JMO.
I agree that in a town or city 9-9:30 PM it would be barely dark. In the desert it would be almost daylight. But way out in the woods, surrounded by forests with very tall trees and dense undergrowth (Kudzu) no close houses, at least a quarter mile off the road, 9-9:30 PM would have been very very dark.
JMO