Very odd, agree with other posters that SB presented the not at home from hike on Monday info not as a concerning issue, said in passing. I like BE’s question to him, why when LE made statements on Wed/Thurs they knew where BL was, he did not correct them or call and find out where his client is? MOO
Thank you for the explanation!! so the contact came from police initiating or from a request from the house? I appreciate your help.
I'm curious...
Does anyone recall reading or hearing if Gabby had her Apple watch on when she was found?
Does anyone recall reading or hearing what kind of Apple watch she had?
Was it the kind that monitored pulse, heart rate, oxygen, miles walked etc.?
Was it the type that could record audio via a 3rd party app?
I keep wondering if by some chance her watch, if she was wearing it, could play a significant role in narrowing down or zeroing in on her time of death given the right circumstances.
Was there any cellular data networks in the area that her watch could connect to?
It was a remote area and BL did tell his hitch hike drivers that his fiancé was working on her van life social media blog. If there's any truth to her working on her blog while at Spread Creek before she died, that would also mean it may have been possible for her watch to connect....
Personally, I think his camping alone-hitch hiking story to the folks giving him rides was, with bits of past truth sprinkled in, bs for cover purposes. I think Gabby was deceased when he was hitch hiking.
I don't even want to think about a third-party app that would enable audio recordings on her watch.
I just can't go there.
Photo link: Brian's Instagram
Login • Instagram
Some states are currently pursuing policy changes in which a social worker accompanies LE to DV calls. LE training is always good, but LE can't possibly be expected to be legal experts and social workers at the same time. I personally think such initiatives should be supported and funded as prevention programs. imo
Yes, that's because that is the guise NY used to take the report. NY fudged a bit and used NY as Gabby's current address (even though she hadn't lived there in quite some time) and listed FL as Gabby's previous address.
"Gabby Petito’s mother Nichole Schmidt called the North Port Police Department on Sept. 10, hoping to file a missing person report, according to a department spokesperson. North Port police told the family they had to file the report in her last known location was, not in North Port, because of department policy and Florida law."
Gabby Petito investigation timeline
Yes, "calls" can be initiated from anywhere. Phone calls, officer patrols, requests from other agencies, follow-ups to a location, etc. The "Call Summary" is an official record of all these activities tied to a certain location. jmo
Thank you, I was under the impression LE was not at the house in response to a 911 call to report missing person. They went there to see if he was home and the MP report resulted from learning BL was not there and had not been seen since Monday.
No, absolutely not. He seemed rather annoyed that the MPR was filed at all, and the person who initiated it.
Yes, this must have been maddening for NS. FL tells her to file a report to the location Gabby went missing. How was NS supposed to know where Gabby went missing? Isn't that what the police are for? I think Suffolk County found a way to work around the system. Since Gabby was in Suffolk County when NS last physically saw her, they filed the report at that location. imo
Certainly. He’s trying to cast aspersions on her character.
I've always thought that.
I think we will know eventually, once the autopsy and death certificate are completed. FL is pretty liberal with their release of information. But maybe not. It can be touchy surrounding records related to suicides - if this is indeed determined to be suicide. imo
