10ofRods
Verified Anthropologist
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2019
- Messages
- 15,405
- Reaction score
- 192,256
haDo you know if the identification by dental records is being questioned? I thought it was confirmed. Why would they still be looking for generic evidentiary material? Maybe there is some point of law where identification via DNA trumps that completed via record comparison? I have no idea, maybe I’m missing a point of why the quest for an answer about DNA analysis has become so important.
I'm not sure it was ever said by LE that they were sending the remains to the forensic anthropologist for identification (although they may end up finding evidence that corroborates ID).
Instead, they are looking for Cause of Death. Microscopic injuries on bones will show if the injuries were inflicted while bones were fresh and living - or later, after person was dead. Alligator bite or chew marks. If part of the skeleton has been carried off, some animal probably chewed that part off early on and they will be able to tell (maybe) which animal it was. There are also studies they can do that might help with time of death - not that it matters much in this case.
I think they want to know whether it was a suicide. It might be fairly obvious to LE, but they'd want the forensic anthropologist to confirm (especially if, say, no bullet was found or something like cutting was involved...)