This article does a really good job of explaining the charges.But parole, even if granted, comes after a minimum of 30 years. Absent reversal upon appeal, Greg isn't likely to leave prison alive.
EXPLAINER: What are the charges in Ahmaud Arbery's killing? | AP News
I agree. I don't think any of us will ever forget seeing this young man killed and knowing his fear and pain in that moment on the street alone. Breaks my heart every time I think about it. This brings some small measure of justice. I keep hoping that one of these men will express some remorse, but I guess that won't happen.
But parole, even if granted, comes after a minimum of 30 years. Absent reversal upon appeal, Greg isn't likely to leave prison alive.
EXPLAINER: What are the charges in Ahmaud Arbery's killing? | AP News
The sentence for felony murder and malice murder is exactly the same,” said University of Georgia law professor emeritus Ron Carlson. “It is a distinction without a difference in terms of punishment.”
The minimum penalty is life in prison. It is up to the judge to decide whether that comes with or without the possibility of parole. Even if the possibility of parole is granted, a person convicted of murder must serve 30 years before becoming eligible.
Jurors in Georgia are not supposed to consider the potential penalty when deliberating on guilt or innocence, as sentencing is up to the judge. Many defense attorneys believe jurors should be allowed to consider the consequences of their decisions, particularly since they may be confused about the distinction between malice and felony murder and may believe felony murder is less serious and comes with a lower penalty.
I agree.I think that the LE officer who lied to Ahmaud's mother about him being killing while burgling should be charged with something.
I think that the LE officer who lied to Ahmaud's mother about him being killing while burgling should be charged with something.
I'm very happy hearing these verdicts. I'm still so very sad for Ahmauds family, and for TM's son. So many lives will never be the same because of the senseless choices made that day.
I think that the LE officer who lied to Ahmaud's mother about him being killing while burgling should be charged with something.
THIS! This, this, this... All of this! I couldn't say it better.This just verdict happened because of several facts:
The Georgia Bureau of Investigation took over from the good ol boy police department - If they had not intervened this day would not have occurred
Roddy was arrogant enough to think taking that video would show what a great thing he and the McMichaels did that day when they murdered a young black man in cold blood- that video helped seal the guilty verdict
The jury was smart and thoughtful
Linda D. hit it out of the park- she is an amazing prosecutor-----
The judge is blessed with good demeanor and had control of his courtroom
I hadn't thought about TM's son. And I know that they brought it up in trial - that TM had to shoot because he was thinking of his son and if AA got his gun and shot him.
But in actuality, if TM really was thinking of his son, he wouldn't have put himself in this position. He may have had coast guard training, and maybe in the past showing someone a weapon made the person flee. But here, he showed the weapon and didn't allow AA to flee. What was AA supposed to do? TM had plenty of opportunities to retreat and he didn't. He made a conscious choice.
I hadn't heard that TM said that. I haven't watched the whole trial though. I did hear the portion that TM was trying to put his son to sleep on the couch when his dad ran in.I hadn't thought about TM's son. And I know that they brought it up in trial - that TM had to shoot because he was thinking of his son and if AA got his gun and shot him.
But in actuality, if TM really was thinking of his son, he wouldn't have put himself in this position. He may have had coast guard training, and maybe in the past showing someone a weapon made the person flee. But here, he showed the weapon and didn't allow AA to flee. What was AA supposed to do? TM had plenty of opportunities to retreat and he didn't. He made a conscious choice.
Isn't that obstruction of justice or aiding an official to subvert the course of justice (DA)?She *could* try to bring a case of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Not saying she'd be victorious on it though.