Surely if they are no longer foster parents of A. a missing, presumed deceased child and B. a child who is now not in their care (permanently?!? - not sure on the current legal status here so all possibly MOO), then there is no longer the call/justification of hiding the FPs to 'protect the identity' of the 'other child'?!? As they are surely now 'ex Foster parents'?? What a case! I feel so sad for the other child, L has gone through 2 sets of 'parents' in her childhood it may appear! Protect L yes, but ex foster parents?!? Hmmm. Did the 'protecting' of identities actually help or hinder this case??? I wonder what precedent it may set for other 'looked after' children and their carers in future cases. Bad enough a child goes missing, but all the added secrecy, procedure etc seems to just have added more layers to an already complex case.But if they release their identities I feel this case could potentially be solved. Hiding their identity hasn’t helped the case that’s for sure. Imo
Last edited: