I'm not convinced of this potential ID.
The remains were believed to be those of an artist and/or photographer. The Sammie Davis ID'd in the article does not appear to fit the quite extensive evidence found on scene IMO. That is unfortunate for the family wanting to find their dear adopted brother, of course.
I wonder what happened to the lead from the Thanksgiving photo that apparently led to thinking he was an artist from NM or elsewhere in the West after someone in the photo responded to an appeal by LE. Was that photo discredited?
Also, when did LE release a name (just recently in the NAMUS profile)? I find that puzzling since if it was found in his belongings, why hold it so long? Now the height of the UID is in question, too? By now I was hopeful for an ID not a vague NAMUS post that doesn't even include the items found, especially the camera & photos. Of course, I realize these cases are challenging.
Genetic genealogy is the key here IMO. Maybe
@othram can work on this case?
I want LE to release more info - tell us what they have found that gives them this name & what progress is being made with DNA (databases checked, etc.).
Looking forward to the day this man is identified & hoping it doesn't take almost another year for that to happen.
MOO