You can sometimes find them on YouTube a day or two after.I have no access to either, so I am grateful for the play by play given by other members. Thank you all!
<modsnip>If I read that right, he called DM seeing him in the house "hearsay".Well we all know that it is totally inaccurate.
Page 5 of the Affidavit says a latent shoe print was found outside DM’s bedroom.
Also DM never said he went out the slider, she says he was walking in that direction.
I think the author of this article did some speed-reading. JMO
View attachment 395238
Last week's Dateline was online the day after it aired. Pretty sure this will be as well. JMOYou can sometimes find them on YouTube a day or two after.
BBM. The problem is that the PCA does not say, and nothing else I have found says the bolded part except that article. The article got it wrong, imo. The shoe print was INSIDE, but outside DMs room per the PCA.Why? DM said, via information in PCA, that the killer walked from the area of the living room right past DM's door heading towards the sliding glass door in the kitchen. Right outside the sliding glass door LE found a shoe print in the mud. Why jump off the balcony when you can just walk down the stairs unimpeded?
Because the PCA states that the Vans footprint was found outside her bedroom door, not the sliding glass door.Why? DM said, via information in PCA, that the killer walked from the area of the living room right past DM's door heading towards the sliding glass door in the kitchen. Right outside the sliding glass door LE found a shoe print in the mud. Why jump off the balcony when you can just walk down the stairs unimpeded?
Watching both shows; there are many people interviewed that we have not heard from before. That is new to me.Not learning anything new so far on 20:20
This^I think the author of this article did some speed-reading.
Compare its description to the description of the footprint in the PCAIMO, indicative of someone jumping off the balcony perhaps?
Here's the actual quote:<modsnip> If I read that right, he called DM seeing him in the house "hearsay".
MassGuy, I used to be a MassGirl. That 'no threat to the public' thing bugged me from the very beginning. I could not conceive of how that early in the investigation they could know that. I am rooting for this Police Department but I am still shaking my head about that one.Watching dateline now, and I’m fired up about the “no threat to the public,” thing. I totally forgot about that. No, this guy wouldn’t have killed again for a while, but they couldn’t have known that at the time.
Here's more nonsense from the DM:
She opened her bedroom door, then saw a man in a black ski mask that covered his nose and mouth, walking 'towards her'.
How do we know the police didn’t identify him quickly and were trailing him?MassGuy, I used to be a MassGirl. That 'no threat to the public' thing bugged me from the very beginning. I could not conceive of how that early in the investigation they could know that. I am rooting for this Police Department but I am still shaking my head about that one.