Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a little testy smirk from AM when Harpo did not have the correct evidential photo regarding footwear!
Whew! I am really having a tough time watching Harpootlian's treatment of this witness. He's just plain mean.Yes, he enjoys gaslighting the women expert witnesses. He's good at finding subtle ways to demean them and discredit their skills. Can't stand that guy, but that's part of the culture there from what I've heard.
Where would Paul have run? He was caught inside the feed room. He was a sitting duck (I hate saying that - can’t think of a more careful way to say it).Done it myself and handling weapons for years but if one plans to kill someone and make sure their down I wouldn't want to be shooting from the hip like a scene off the Rifleman with Chuck Conners. Want to put the bead on em just in case they decide to run and so on IMO.
On cue AM is rocking and shaking now that the testimony is about Paul. It's predictable now. IMO
I think that is the point. She's female. He's been like that to all the female professionals.DH…what you did was…
Why not just ask this witness what she did?
I find him so condescending.
Just going off the natural action of many self as well who handle weapons, usually shoulder them even at close ranges but the "Rifleman" theory is plausible as well.Where would Paul have run? He was caught inside the feed room. He was a sitting duck (I hate saying that - can’t think of a more careful way to say it).
@Elley Mae has provided the link in the above post. On page 10 the question is CLEAR:According to document shooter outside of door to the west side of entry.
Page 46