SC - Paul Murdaugh & mom Margaret Found Shot To Death - Alex Murdaugh Accused - Islandton #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think he had dress shoes on in the tree video but not sure.
But really, he arrives at mom’s clean clothed head to toe, but ditches the shoes before LE gets there with no explanation as to why.
This is bugging me big time.

In the tree video it does look to me, IMHO, like a kind of Sperry?

 
I think he had dress shoes on in the tree video but not sure.
But really, he arrives at mom’s clean clothed head to toe, but ditches the shoes before LE gets there with no explanation as to why.
This is bugging me big time.
Embarrassing for AM Planting a tree failure and in dress shoes to boot! I had to laugh at that one!
 
Staggering to listen to again the amount's AM sucked from the lifeblood of the town and as well as the people who trusted him along with the lengths that he would go to, murder IMO to get more money. The eyes that I see in court have no soul behind them other then a method actor, poor one at that.
 
In following media coverage on a few channels, I am noticing an abundance of caution criticizing the defense (to the point that I am willing to call it charity) and an aggressive tendency to criticize the prosecution's case. I think there is a legal vulnerability (maybe in the form of libel or slander?) to making commentary about the prosecution's case that is implying clear guilt on A's part. I don't think there are any repercussions for being highly critical of the prosecution; commentators can say whatever they want.

I guess what I'm saying is, IMO, media coverage is giving AM a very generous interpretation of the evidence. Very generous.

I understand the presumption of innocence. I understand that we are hearing the prosecution's case right now, so they are more likely to be the subject of a critique. I know that I may be selecting biased media. I also know that the media is in the business of sensationalism and fostering conflict. Their money is made through controversy.

I just notice an imbalance. I think the fact that the defendant is an attorney represented by very formidable and expensive attorneys is shaping coverage to be overly cautious, and even absurdly partisan, at times. It feels to me that A is getting yet another advantage.

I could have a distorted perspective. Although, I am passionate about justice, and I feel like I try to be as fair as possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
223
Guests online
4,378
Total visitors
4,601

Forum statistics

Threads
592,453
Messages
17,969,128
Members
228,774
Latest member
OccasionalMallard
Back
Top