Here's another problem or two I have with all this then.
*********************
It's really difficult to explain away the fact that Tommy has already (in previous "confession story") put himself as accessory to murder - in the van, at the river, ... isn't it? :crazy:
Why would he put himself there, if it were not somehow necessary?
Yes, it is crazy to put yourself there like that. Unless you have to.
I think this confession of Tommy's tells us that Tommy is, indeed, in this thing. Is there some physical evidence forcing this amount of confession out of Tommy? Surely Tommy gave that much up because he felt he had to. (Did he also believe it might help Misty somehow?)
Would Tommy seek to protect Ron by throwing himself out there as accessory? Nope, I don't think so.
Would Tommy be willing to attempt to protect Misty by throwing himself out there as accessory to evil Cousin Joe? Yes, I think so, but ... only if he actually was accessory or worse.
Would Tommy protect himself by spinning this yarn? Yes. Tommy could put his Cousin Joe in the role of killer, and himself as accessory to avoid the murder rap and pin it on his Cousin Joe. He'd have no problem with that. Clearly, even his Grandma Flo would buy that one. And being accessory after the fact is better than being the murderer.
So, Tommy's protecting himself - and maybe Misty - with his previous confession.
Conclusion for now: Tommy's gotta be in this thing.
**********************
So....
Why would Misty not roll on Tommy and let him get away with murder all of this time? Sisterly loyalty? (hmmmm...not so sure)
Or is it her compassion for Lisa and her love for her niece/nephews? (more likely)
Or is Misty, in fact, the murderer/lethal-doser, and Tommy simply her accessory after the fact? (yes, yes, very very likely)
All that time - did she protect Tommy, urge his silence, because it protected herself?
(could explain things)
Will this be a sister/brother he-said/she-said?
**************************************
Does Ron have a stake in Misty's efforts to protect her brother Tommy? Unable to get home, was his best option to encourage Misty to enlist Tommy's help and stage a break-in/kidnapping to keep the whole sordid mess a secret?
Will it be a Misty/Ron he-said/she-said too?
*******************************
And finally...:waitasec:
Misty has, for a long time, been pointing to Tommy. Limply. But still - pointing to Tommy. The door was bumped - to paraphrase - "like the way my brother does it when he robs a house". Tommy "messed with me" when I was little. And more paraphrasing "Tommy robbed the neighbor - oh - and oh yeah the yellow rope in the house..." Restraining order against Tommy.
Then again... Ratgate against Tommy points to Tommy as more of an accessory to be silenced rather than as the murderer...
IMO, anyway you slice it - we've got Misty & Tommy in the hot seat.
IMO, Ron and Misty needed & actually encouraged Tommy's silence. :shutup: (rat)
We have Ron pointing limply at Cousin Joe, but, IIRC, Ron never pointed at Tommy. Why?
Misty limply pointed to Tommy and also to Cousin Joe off and on as a "back-up scapegoats" - Ron's idea?
Misty never points at Ron and sports her devotion to him on her backside - IMO because Ron can do most damage to her. Ron KNOWS.
Perhaps Misty's only playing card in this sordid deck was that she simply did what Ron (or his family) told her to do to his daughter.
And now Ron can deny that, unless evidence or witness can BORD-ly link whatever killed Haleigh to Ron.
I guess Misty can try to do this, but ... I fear that's a he-said/she-said loser.
It's up to Tommy and/or Misty to put Ron there that night. If they can't ... I think we can all see why Ron got the plea deal.
And some might begin predicting a Misty/Tommy shared culpability in a court of law for the loss of our angel Haleigh. :cry: