Xavier
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2012
- Messages
- 955
- Reaction score
- 1
I have significant doubts about the bat being used, Botha was asked if there were any other injuries under oath (that is perjury under any legal system and is a serious charge
)
the autospsy had been done prior to the bail hearing and the defence would most likely have had a copy
if OP had bashed her with bat then he would surely have told his lawyers, and the affidavit would not have gone into details, he was not required at the bail hearing to provide many details about the event, all he had to do was show he was not a threat to the public or violent or a flight risk
why would her father say if OP story is true we may be able to forgive him if he has been told OP bashed his daughters head in
why would an experienced prosecutor not tell the Judge the fact that would have meant OP was denied bail
if he did hit her with bat then states case is proven, I wait to see if this is further speculation or fact
plus Botha said he attended autopsy which makes his lie under oath even more serious
Hey Joe -- Can we really beleive Botha had his full undivided attention to details in this OP case, when he knew shortly he himself had a murder charge to deal with
Just saying, I doubt Botha was paying attention to the OP case details, when he had to fight for his own life now
http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/21/world/africa/south-africa-pistorius-case