Not buying it... this was a thought out...fantasized about..pre-meditated murder. Jodi stole the gun...borrowed the gas cans...drove to Travis's house ...ambushed him....cleaned up her mess as best she could and fled.... Amazing:twocents::twocents: how these people come out of the woodwork to give their opinion and tell how detectives and true professionals don't know the things that they know...please !!! JMO...:twocents:
The guy is a fool who can not grasp that it's the totality of the circumstantial evidence that does her in, not any individual piece by itself (except the gun which by itself is enough to crush her). I can debunk most of what he said but I'll just stick to some of his closing.
"Therefore, when a group of boys, skateboarders, see a beautiful girl with long flowing hair go into Starbucks, what would they do but turn her licenses plates upside down for a lark? I would have done the same during my crazy summer. This is not a mystery. Sixteen year-old boys think differently than other human beings."
I knocked on doors and ran away when I was a kid too. Boys and girls did it. But never did I take a screw driver and remove someone's front and back license plates and put one of them upside down just a day before the car owner coincidentally commits a brutal murder in "self-defense". It's the timing that's important here combined with all the other pieces of evidence like her cell being turned off for 23 hours which he of course ignores.
"Someone stole Arias’ grandparent’s .25 along with other things in the house. Did the police find the other articles in Arias’ possession? Did they charge her with this crime? Remember, Arias has no criminal record, so theft is not her problem. There are so many .25s in the world if they suddenly disappeared, the loss of weight would pitch this planet out of orbit. If Arias’ grandparents owned a Ford Fiesta and Alexander owned a Ford Fiesta, nobody would think anything about the coincidence. There are far more .25s in this country than Ford Fiestas."
This "argument" is just mind bogglingly stupid. Of course other things were stolen (a DVD player but not more valuable things like holstered rifles) because she wanted to STAGE a burglary to give her an alibi for the missing gun. Having no criminal record regarding theft means absolutely nothing.
Being intellectually dishonest or just ignorant or both, he leaves out the time in which the gun was stolen, and that was 6 days before the murder. He also ignores that she disposed of the gun afterwards. A tale-tale sign that she was afraid of it being traced backed to her and thereby implicating her directly. Furthermore, she denied twice to Flores that he own any guns, statements made years before her current story.
His analogy with the Ford Fiesta completely fails because a Ford Fiesta was not stolen from her grandparents house just six days before she runs Travis over in "self-defense" with a Ford Fiesta that she claims belonged to Travis (with no evidence beyond her word and initially denying it), and then burns said Ford Fiesta with gas from gas cans so that the Ford can't be identified as the one stolen from her grandparent's house. And I don't think that there are nearly as many 25 caliber owners as there are Ford Fiesta owners.
"The lack of additional ammunition in Alexander’s house is meaningless. I carried a .38 for months that was loaded with six rounds. I possessed no other ammo but these six rounds. I never fired the weapon and never bought more ammunition."
He forgets about the holster Jodi claimed he had and says nothing about a cleaning kit.
The rest of his ignorant speculation is just too lame to bother with (idiot still believes that his skull wasn't penetrated despite X-RAYS showing two holes in his skull). If something doesn't fit into his little theory, he just invokes this copout logic, "she wanted to wash away the horror in her alternate universe". The guy has no grasp of the case.
she's gonna be hearing "no" a lot!
