Oh I agree with most of what your saying
Billie said recently that he did a search on decomposing bodies the day Hailey went missing. She also said some other incriminating things but my main question would be if what she is saying is true why wait for over two years to say these things? why only say them when Shawn has said negative things about her first?
My main concern is that there will just not be enough evidence to find out what actually happened, and to convict the person who did this to Hailey.
Her remains were not found for 2 years, that is a long time that she was out in the elements, they may not even be able to determine COD. Most types of physical evidence that may have been there (DNA, fibers, etc.) would have been washed away or degraded. Unless there was something WITH the remains that would directly point to the perpetrator. I am hoping this is the case.
I think if this case had been treated differently from the start it would never have gotten to this point. When I was reading the old threads the main concern at first is that Hailey was being looked at as a runaway by LE. It wasn't until about January 2nd or 3rd (from my recollection) that they brought in some other agencies and started REALLY investigating. That's a lot of time for evidence to be hidden or destroyed.
I hope investigators have a lot of stuff they are keeping to themselves, and are just getting their ducks in a row for an arrest. But I really fear that is not the case.
how many missing kid cases aren't considered runaways in the first hours? basically all of them are looked at as runaways at first, that has to change, because the first 48 hours if critical in any investigation. I don't remember is they ever mentioned that clothing was or wasn't found with the remains? fibers can possible remain in tack if they are the type to cling such as car carpets. if you were an investigator, wouldn't you find it suspicious that his cell phone pinged towers in a remote area mile and miles away from her home not only in a remote area, but in the same general area her remains were found 2 years later. that is way to much of a coincidence for me to over look, it doesn't prove guilt, but it proves he was out in that area at the time she was missing, his cell phone didn't just start pinging random towers, they don't work like that, they serve a certain area until you travel beyond that service area then another tower picks it up. I think law enforcement knows stuff they aren't releasing so they don't compromise the investigation. in their eyes, I believe they know SA isn't only a person of interest but the main suspect now. So where is SA today? that is the question, has he skipped town?
My main concern is that there will just not be enough evidence to find out what actually happened, and to convict the person who did this to Hailey.
Her remains were not found for 2 years, that is a long time that she was out in the elements, they may not even be able to determine COD. Most types of physical evidence that may have been there (DNA, fibers, etc.) would have been washed away or degraded. Unless there was something WITH the remains that would directly point to the perpetrator. I am hoping this is the case.
I think if this case had been treated differently from the start it would never have gotten to this point. When I was reading the old threads the main concern at first is that Hailey was being looked at as a runaway by LE. It wasn't until about January 2nd or 3rd (from my recollection) that they brought in some other agencies and started REALLY investigating. That's a lot of time for evidence to be hidden or destroyed.
I hope investigators have a lot of stuff they are keeping to themselves, and are just getting their ducks in a row for an arrest. But I really fear that is not the case.
how many missing kid cases aren't considered runaways in the first hours? basically all of them are looked at as runaways at first, that has to change, because the first 48 hours if critical in any investigation. I don't remember is they ever mentioned that clothing was or wasn't found with the remains? fibers can possible remain in tack if they are the type to cling such as car carpets. if you were an investigator, wouldn't you find it suspicious that his cell phone pinged towers in a remote area mile and miles away from her home not only in a remote area, but in the same general area her remains were found 2 years later. that is way to much of a coincidence for me to over look, it doesn't prove guilt, but it proves he was out in that area at the time she was missing, his cell phone didn't just start pinging random towers, they don't work like that, they serve a certain area until you travel beyond that service area then another tower picks it up. I think law enforcement knows stuff they aren't releasing so they don't compromise the investigation. in their eyes, I believe they know SA isn't only a person of interest but the main suspect now. So where is SA today? that is the question, has he skipped town?
But that is my main concern, that ALL they have is phone pings. You can't convict on pings. People are prosecuted on circumstantial evidence all the time, but it has to be a whole collection of circumstantial beyond a reasonable doubt. Shawn acting odd and creepy in combination with the pings are just not enough. I hope they have more than that.
My main concern is that there will just not be enough evidence to find out what actually happened, and to convict the person who did this to Hailey.
Her remains were not found for 2 years, that is a long time that she was out in the elements, they may not even be able to determine COD. Most types of physical evidence that may have been there (DNA, fibers, etc.) would have been washed away or degraded. Unless there was something WITH the remains that would directly point to the perpetrator. I am hoping this is the case.
I think if this case had been treated differently from the start it would never have gotten to this point. When I was reading the old threads the main concern at first is that Hailey was being looked at as a runaway by LE. It wasn't until about January 2nd or 3rd (from my recollection) that they brought in some other agencies and started REALLY investigating. That's a lot of time for evidence to be hidden or destroyed.
I hope investigators have a lot of stuff they are keeping to themselves, and are just getting their ducks in a row for an arrest. But I really fear that is not the case.
how many missing kid cases aren't considered runaways in the first hours? basically all of them are looked at as runaways at first, that has to change, because the first 48 hours if critical in any investigation. I don't remember is they ever mentioned that clothing was or wasn't found with the remains? fibers can possible remain in tack if they are the type to cling such as car carpets. if you were an investigator, wouldn't you find it suspicious that his cell phone pinged towers in a remote area mile and miles away from her home not only in a remote area, but in the same general area her remains were found 2 years later. that is way to much of a coincidence for me to over look, it doesn't prove guilt, but it proves he was out in that area at the time she was missing, his cell phone didn't just start pinging random towers, they don't work like that, they serve a certain area until you travel beyond that service area then another tower picks it up. I think law enforcement knows stuff they aren't releasing so they don't compromise the investigation. in their eyes, I believe they know SA isn't only a person of interest but the main suspect now. So where is SA today? that is the question, has he skipped town?
part of an article she had been wearing was found nearby. I don't know how much of it though
opcorn:
