Search results

Will the jury be able to convict without knowledge of the fight that ICA and CA had the night before? Because I think the motive is weak...why wouldn't she just leave the child with her mother, many mothers do when they are too young to face the challenge of motherhood. Her hatred of her...

IMO, she said the ultimate opinion of this case: JA: You would agree that the bond between mother and child is hard to break, even with death. SK: I don't think it breaks. JA: No further questions.

Hi, there! This blog has a pretty comprehensive list and analysis of the possible evidence upcoming.... http://frictionpowered.wordpress.com/category/michelle-young/ It helped me get a really great handle on the upcoming case!

Lying and/or changing stories leads an investigation astray. Sorry, I thought you were following the trial. BC did that. And if he didn't, then there wouldn't be a trial right now. My point has been since this started, that some will call out any witness in any inconsistency and say...

Yes, but my point is opinions formed with experience and/or research hold more value than anything else. So if neither if those things can back your opinion, then why comment? Can you respect an opinion different from your own that is based on experience and still come to the conclusion that...

Fine, i stand corrected. Then they are both guilty. But since they don't like each other, how does that work?

When someone gives a deposition, they swear under an oath just like they are a witness in a trial.

If there was not one single qualifier of an abusive relationship there, then why have so many posters come forward and shared their personal stories and say they relate to NC? Were you in a DV marriage? If your answer is no, perhaps you need to spend less time invalidating the emotional...

But that wasn't what you said. You said JA looked the way she did bc she lied. Well, BC lied as well. So in one scenario, someone can look poorly because they lie and have privilege, and in another scenario, someone can look poorly and lie because he lives in a jail. It seems the thing in...

You said JA lied, and therefore, that could be construed as obstruction of justice. Then, by the same logic, BC lied, and that can also be construed as obstruction of justice. So now, they are equal, because they both lied. So how do we determine who is more likely responsible...

Yes, sorry. Thank you. I think I was typing while you were sending...:waitasec:

I never said i gave her the benefit of the doubt. I said she was under scrutiny for inconsistincies, like BC is and she must be under stress as well. But there is one thing we do know: she was trying to help find NC while someone else was trying to protect themselves. If JA was trying to...

Perhaps, but I also saw MH do a whole lot of back-tracking and evading answering questions on the stand. Did you use NC's phone? I would never use her phone without her permission... What? It is either yes/ or no. But we see he was interviewed several times to see if he was an alibi...

I DID NOT SAY HE DID IT, THOUGH THAT MAY BE MY OPINION. Please do not twist my words. What I said, is regardless of what side of the fence you are on, BDI or BDDI, it is a fact BC was the last one we know FOR SURE saw her alive. Unless there was an eye witness who knew her personally, and...

And it must be difficult for JA as well, because even though none of us know her personally, many have decided she is a deceitful liar, some possibly think murder, and she has to get on camera and describe what she did. And if she really just wanted to help her friend, and her actions have...

I agree, you can see where BC has been repeatedly picking at his face. And those dark circles/bags under his eyes don't help either.

So by your reasoning, BC is guilty of obstruction of justice as well? I would say his obstruction of justice holds more weight, IMO, because he was the last person we DEFINITELY know who saw her alive.

I have been laying low mysef more recently....when i start feeling my blood pressure go up, I put myself in time-out.

I thought Boz did a great, but hurried job after watching him....... But how he finished, which I think is great, is this: BC tried to control her, did contol her, and though through this trial, they are still saying she's a liar. It's Nannerisms. Someday in a DV case, a woman won't be...

I thought Boz did a great job, and his final words hit me...