The only just-about-somewhat-remotely "acceptable" reason , in my view, to be keeping quiet on the whereabout and welfare of the baby , is if the baby is currently safe and being looked after by someone .
Any other hypothesis , allow me to struggle to reconcile .
Thank you for your reply , i have started to have a look at this case only recently .
Stop it no , i don't think so either .
But "watch" the account yes , they definitely can and would have been doing so IMO.
I mean desperate times-desperate measures , but to withdraw from a cash point from her...
It has seemed to me for a while that if a person was to escape from that area undetected , in a vehicle , the safest way appears (to me at least) to be across the shallow-ish part of the river around the bend past the bench area .
Across into Hall Ln , into a vehicle and eastbound.
I don't know...
So at least we have that HE went by and saw the phone on the bench ( admittedly led by the sky reporter ) .
And that he went by after the dog had been tied up. How he found it we don't know because the reporter interrupted him .
Replied just to add that it's not just stigma .
It is also viewed ( not saying in this case in particular) as downright sinful for religious people ( of certain religious groups).
Two milleniums of being told " to hell " are not simply going to go away in a couple of libertarian decades , IMO .
I really think a pinned post with estabilished evidence and facts ( thus minimizing repetition , removing need for a link , facilitate discourse ) is , at this point , almost needed .
The media thread is excellent , but "away" from here .
But for that we need a volunteer , so to speak :)