Plus, the claw of a claw hammer can definitely puncture a skull.
it (large piece of edged thick metal wielded like club) may in fact be one of the few commonly found items which is not a gun, that can do so.
Well, it's the only thing i found when i searched her COD... and you said above, categorically with no qualifiers, that her COD was by a gun... precision is important.
Yeah, I've literally never heard or read of the locution 'puncture wounds', being used as a synonym for 'gunshots' or 'bullet wounds'.
It could indicate a knife, but seems more like an ice pick or an awl.
those sweet boys have been through much... some of it doubtless very enjoyable. Anne always had a surfeit of energy, that seemed as if she would have been particularly suited to life as a boymom... I hope they thrive, poor dears.
This has scientific backing, doesn't it? I thought the underpinning belief is that drunk/high people don't tense up or brace, rather rolling with the impact like rubber balls, so they're less likely to become an immovable object.
Yeah, that doesn't bother me either, since naturally, someone looking to write a book absolutely specifically is simultaneously trying to bring something to the public; in this case knowledge.
I know… I’ll never look at an op-Ed the same way again at minimum, you can be sure… I was actually impressed for a hot minute in 2018, when I thought Amber Heard had largely written it herself.
“Huh,” I thought, “maybe all that PR bilge about her being so super smart and such a reader has got...
I suspect her goal is trying to make JD look like the bad guy for 'making' him delve into her finances with a microscope. 'Prove that 'you' paid 6 mill to your lawyers', etc.
Remarkably sleazy and slanted reporting, might as well have been written by her sleazy PR man David Shane... couldn't this in fact be seen as journalistic malpractice??
Specifically addressing one tiny hole in the metadata provided by Team JD, like they are the sleazes... whilst 200 percent...
she has credited her demeanor to her parents. In one interview, she says her parents owned a hotel (chain? Not sure); but anyway, they lived in it like Eloise, and she said that she and her sister were raised to always be mannerly in the public eye, which I can only imagine must have been very...
… I think they’ll discover she’s a sociopath.
Her batting at the air like the Madwoman of Chaillot to feign insanity probably isn’t going to go over too well with the mental health professionals of the 21st century.
Too bad for her she won't find out how dull an appeal really is… or that it doesn’t bring her face to face with Johnny, for/until several months in the future have passed… hoping she gives Elaine and Rotten daily merry hell by phone for progress reports.
more from Law & Crime:
come to think of it, I think The only person who keeps mentioning the first amendment is PR person David Shane... and that’s because nobody on her legal team actually intends to argue it.
The appeal is pro forma, to keep her in the press and stall on judgment.
Constant repetition of the first...
yeah, well, I wish her luck, especially considering that what they forgot to do during the actual trial was… argue the first amendment for more than five minutes... can it really be a point of appeal if you never argue it first time around??
Another piece of the puzzle:
https://nypost.com/2022/06/02/amber-heard-is-broke-due-to-legal-fees-lavish-spending/
(Has both a nice picture of and identifies the Travelers' rep by name, btw).
Moral of the story: JD and his lawyers are all people of integrity.
AH and Elaine, at minimum, not so much.
Corollary: when Ben Chew tells you a motion/contention is baseless nonsense, he means it is baseless nonsense that would be understood from outer space, lol. This isn’t some “in my...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.