Search results

i think ALL lawyers say that. :o) or at least know it.

no doubt - good one, jmo i think the Boulder DAs have been pulling midnight shifts in Aruba.

i've just started Schiller's book - why is it rarely mentioned anywhere? he seems to be pretty respectable... is it any good?

what photos? how long has this been talked about? and what sheet metal? how large? painted black...? this was not mentioned in Thomas' book. where is it "published" as an interview dialogue...?

yes, i remembered (better remembered) after i posted. i did read the first chapt. of it a few months ago. didn't get to where he was taking me, but it seems to be catching on as a theory... many people stating that the evidence points to the R's guilt, when it seems to me that the evidence...

i forgot about that. I was at Subic Bay for six weeks. Star Base is a little "creative" from someone who should not be allowed to think on their own. even if it IS "I Shall Be TC..." it's still quite a coincidence, all things considered. even if it's JUST a coincidence... i'd like to hear the...

my thoughts were on that when i read your post, so i'll form them here. if the R's KNEW that it was going on, and then the death occurred, they'd be just as reticent to disclose because of their involvement in child *advertiser censored*, even by association - even if not convicted, they'd be socially and...

"growing"...? it's already the single most lucrative venture online. according to some, anyway. probably is growing, but make no mistake, it's matured, as well.

the fact that John's bible was open to the Psalm whose four verses form the acronym CTBS on his desk, IF THAT'S A FACT, is most intriguing to me (as regards this topic). although i have to admit, as lunatic as Karr is (lunacy runs from his eyes like snot), that 'Shall Be The Conqueror" in his...

I'm sorry. do WHAT? i didn't understand a single syllable of that.

Can't remember if i've read Presumed Guilty - don't think so. What's the premise and theory...? (i'm assuming this is a JFK related tome?) Is it any good? Oh, never mind. That's the Ramsey's posture. I was through the first chapter and discovered Thomas' book. Guess i'll go finish PG now, if i...

having just finished Thomas' book, and read his theory about PR doing this on her own without John's knowledge (before the fact, anyway) i'm open to this possibility now. The pineapple convinces me as well as the note, if not moreso. The note is more easily explained away than the pineapple...

Clay Shaw was who the New Orleans DA really did go after (O Stones, 'JFK') in connection with the assassination. he was tied to Ruby and David Ferrie and a whole bunch of people wanting to train Cubans to kill Castro. Which ties in Santos Trafficante, Miami mob boss who was pissed cause Castro...

thanks Eagle1 - i'm way beyond "still interested". not only is it the single awesomest mystery a person could study, fact OR fiction (that and how Howard Dean was elected Party Chair), it also carries such IMMENSE and long reaching ramifications that still affect how our government is today...

is that really your signature...? that logic is as compelling as that of the Bible Codes. i'm a true believer of Christ as the Defeater of Death, but i still happen to believe in coincidence, to a point. you can quite probably find that acronym in every book that's been written, on one page or...

well now, wait a minute. then that would make it SCBT. and that's not what was written... :o) - kidding.

also, i didn't mean that he was bias in his investigation, i meant his bias IN THE BOOK is evident. nothing wrong with appropriate biasedness - it's possible to be biased and still be objective. difficult, but possible. i'd be biased too if i wrote a book about those experiences had i had them.

these are more things i haven't heard yet - Access was simply purchased by Lockheed, wasn't it? That murder shouldn't have affected Lockheed in any way. Unless, of course, there's something we don't know. Pam Paugh gained entrance what? I haven't read this yet. PR's sis, right? it would...

wow. no shet. good points, i didn't know all that. now that you mention it, i recognize HiTech as those the cops wear. who did that Documentary? is that Smit? how awful. i was referring to the generic list someone else left. just to the list itself, not to the R's likely guilt. Scott...

of course, that's the answer. that'd be the answer for every criminal who's ever done anything. "a lot" is relative. a criminal does what he does to avoid detection because what he has to lose, to him, is "a LOT". the R's had to lose: their freedom, (their lives would have been in jeapordy)...