Search results

"It's complicated."

He could at least offer her an autographed copy, plus a generous prison library donation of copies.

There's nothing to settle. She can either drop the suit, or lose. The disbarment can't be used in her appeal because it had nothing to do with the trial. It's based on breaching attorney/client privilege after the trial was over so it's irrelevant to any appeal, which only deals with the trial...

Any breach of Nurmi's fiduciary responsibility has already been compensated by his semi-voluntary disbarment. Further compensation by glomming onto the profits from Nurmi's book would be indistinguishable from profiting from her crime. As much as she may feel entitled to do so, and as much as it...

Can you provide a link? #jodiarias is her Twitter and I don't see anything there. Search of AZ court cases comes up empty.

Because forewarned is forearmed I don't think he knew she was coming either, especially after the fight on the 28th. Once she got there she had a tabula rasa on which to explain why she was there. Suppose she said something like "I was on my way to Utah to meet R.B., a new love interest, but I...

Legal boundaries can be separate from moral boundaries, particularly in a free society, however, if a law is just, when a legal boundary is crossed so is a moral boundary, but then the moral question is answered and addressed only in legal terms. I don't know what Juan did or didn't do, but...

But strategically, they're two sides of the same coin, and I think at some point the idea of making herself the victim in the public's eye must have had some degree of personal appeal, and if successful would have been the ground beneath her feet as she walked away a free 'woman'.

I for one believe they did, not only because of the pictures, which admittedly leave room for doubt, but because IMO it matches her psychology. Everything about the murder was personal; it was revenge against Travis for a failed relationship, one based almost exclusively on sex, and I think her...

Those pictures, as well as the other forensic evidence, caused her whole defensive superstructure of "I wasn't even there!!!" to collapse, in stages, to the ninja defense, to self-defense, the latter of which led to smearing Travis during trial. All her effort to conceal her trip to Arizona came...

In her own mind, she was always the exception to every rule. We all know just how far she chose to take that. Far enough that her life is now filled with rules, and precious little exception.

Perhaps as a taunt: "There were pictures, but you'll never see them!" Egotistical, but not very intelligent. i.e. par for the course.

She sees her part more than anyone else can, but she also cares less than anyone else can. This is no paradox, this is explanation.

Thanks for the kind words DidIAskYou. So many of the people that participated in these discussions over the years have my deepest respect and admiration, that's a large part of why I think I've come back now and then.

Plates: we can only speculate but since she made obvious efforts to keep her presence in Arizona as stealth as possible (turning off her phone, gas cans, dyeing hair) California plates in Travis' neighborhood around the time of the murder, while not directly incriminating, were a weak point. One...

That pretty much defines psychopathology doesn't it? Whether it's Bernie Madoff building a personal kingdom on the inevitable financial ruin of thousands upon thousands of people, or someone who murders their innocent spouse for no other reason than they're in the way of their selfish ambitions...