Search results

Yes. Do you mind if I send the reply as a PM for right now? Thanks for your comments.

OK, but I'm still not sure you know what I mean. But since you mentioned it - what is your alternate theory of generational abuse as it relates to this case? I searched the forum and only found one or two threads that even mention this. Thanks.

I may have been able to pull something up back in 1996-7, but I've been away from the case for 10 years. Again, whoa. I did not say it was a quote. I said I believe I heard someone report, or PR say that there were 'six of us in the house that night'. This is as close as I can get to a quote...

Whoa, I didn't say I had proof. My main point is that no one is discussing this particular theory. But, first, we are not 'insiders' as to this case. We do not have access to the evidence. Suffice it to say the BPD thought it important enough to travel to obtain evidence from these people...

Yet the authorities did journey and take a DNA sample...allegedly. I believe I heard a quote from PR, early on: "There were six of us in the house that night" Motive? Sure. Generational child abuse.

A stranger? Generational. That means within the family. So, no, not a stranger or a friend.

Yes, but I think people may be looking in the wrong place; or they're just not saying openly. I can't tell which.

I don't think any of those you mentioned did it, though they surely helped cover it up.

Hi, just finished watching PMPT, and was prompted to come read the forum. I noticed that only a few people over the years (2003 until present) specifically postulated that this crime was generational: What I'm wondering is why nobody seemed to take this to the logical conclusion? People have...